User talk:Mark at RAEng

Looking to collaborate on engineering-focused projects, feel free to message me.Mark at RAEng (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per

WP:GNG

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Engineering Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark at RAEng! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on

Hi Mark, nice work on your new article. It would benefit from being added to appropriate categories and Wikiprojects - at minimum, the Biogrpahy wikiproject.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark at RAEng,

Thank you for creating Harish Bhaskaran.

No significant indication cation of notability, plus far too much peacock. Please rewrite and resubmit.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Harish Bhaskaran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because as a Wikipedia in residence you should know better, both the peacock and lack of notability validation.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Mark at RAEng. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on Suzanne Farid. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this page for a UCL professor of Engineering. I've linked it to Wikidata, somethings that's often worth doing when you're starting new pages. It would also be helpful to intengrate it into Wikipedia by linking it from other pages. One way of doing this is to link Farid's page as part of the articles of hers that are cited on other pages; there's an optional element in the template:cite journal for doing this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]