User talk:Mark viking
|
|||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
What do you think about this? Similar aritcle and my BEFORE is showing just mentions in passing? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't performed a BEFORE style search on other members of the Z80 family. There is some coverage, e.g. [1]. I consider author Al Williams (of Dr. Dobbs fame) as being a reliable source for this sort of topic. But it seems clear that a merge of verifiable bits and redirect could be a reasonable alternative to deletion for this processor as well. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}20:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Question
Following some links I saw your comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 April 25#Category:Chapman & Hall books. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? Solomon7968 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- For graduate and professional level biology books, I don't think there are any publishers that are as dominant and well thought of as Springer is for Mathematics. It seems a more heterogeneous publishing field. The university-associated publishers like OUP are still well-regarded in biology. For biology journal publishing, Nature, Science, and Cell Press are considered top tier. Medical publishing is a whole separate ecosystem with its own publishers. I don't know much about chemistry publishers. I know that The Royal Society of Chemistry are major publishers with top journals, but I don't know how well-regarded they are for their book publishing. --]
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)