User talk:Mason Clegg

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nyttend (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mercy Corps, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• Cluebot produces very few
  false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here
  , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 21:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi Mason,

I just noticed your edit at User:ClueBot/FalsePositives, and i thought i should drop you a message about it. First and foremost i restored your latest version, and it seems Cluebot is accepting it. I'm not exactly sure if that is because the chance i made added a larger amount of content (Thus easing the impact of words on the filters), or because cluebut utilizes a whitelist i am on (Chances are it doesn't check edits from older accounts). As for it reverting every edit you made: Cluebot had the rollback permission, which means that it will revert all subsequent edits a user makes. This is a really handy feature when you deal with vandalism, but in this case it seems to have caused some collateral damage as well.

Note that i am not cluebots maintainer nor readily involved with the bot, other then meeting it at times so this is not an "Official" reply. Im just a random wikipedian who saw the message and thought he could help :). Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 23:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your disruptive editing of July 5, 2013 here when you added soapboxing, promotional or advertising material and spam external links to the article The Wonderful Wizard of Oz Please do not add this type of material to Wikipedia or you may be blocked from editing. If you have questions, leave them below or on my talk page. (talk) 02:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Civic technology, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Gap9551 (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mason Clegg. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mason Clegg. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]