User talk:Matbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, Matbury, and

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to

sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field
. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! — Mr. Stradivarius 21:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your user page

Hi Matt, and thanks for your edits to

secret handshake. To test it, here's a test: this is a link to matbury.com. (I'm assuming that this is you.) Let me know if you have any questions about anything to do with Wikipedia, and I'll be happy to help. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Talkback

Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Task-based language learning

Hi again Matt. I've noticed you're interested in the

Good Article status? I've been meaning to work on it for a while, and this is as good an excuse as any to get started on it. Let me know what you think. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Waldorf education

Normally, cited material is not removed from an article without some discussion on the talk page. I'm not sure why you took this out; probably there was a good reason. Please explain and discuss this at Talk:Waldorf education.

It looked like straightforward promotion or vandalism to me: a dubious claim linked to an editorial opinion. I've noticed that this has been happening in a few places on Wikipedia with regards to pseudo-scientific claims, such as in this case, Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences hypothesis: It's not a theory because it hasn't been tested because it's a poor hypothesis, i.e. impossible to negate/falsify.Matbury (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dark Mail Alliance, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.darkmail.info/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

talk) 02:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.darkmail.info. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 02:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]