User talk:MateoSag
| This is MateoSag's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Treasure of Gazteluberri has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Murillo de Calahorra moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
- Hi - I've moved all of your stub village articles into draftspace for the time being, since they were all completely unsourced. Please provide sourcing from a reliable independent reference, and then they can simply be moved back into mainspace. If you ping me by using {{u|onel5969}}, I can do those moves for you after you provide the references. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 18:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, MateoSag. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Draft:San Andrés del Valle concern
Hi there, I'm
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
Thank you for your attention.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Castañares de las Cuevas has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)November 2020
Hi MateoSag! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. may does not mean should. And all the arguments laid out before against using the flags may still apply also in that case (to all of them, to some of them: that is open to discussion). Besides, another thing: the collage. There may be some tension in using a plethora of landmarks. A city is not a collection of facades of religious landmarks. Insofar that is the case, using that approach for the infobox may be dubious as well as lazy. Another thing: the map. Think that two approaches may be valid, and different approaches may be chosen when using for a small municipality and a bigger city (for example). WP:BOLD is nice and all that, but devoting yourself only to changes barely related to actual content (yet not minor/copy edit et. al. WikiGnome changes) that you may consider to be improvements but they may be not considered as such by others and thus they may be easily undone may be not the most productive thing to do in Wikipedia and particularly if your efforts aim toward achieving a wider consistency across articles not fully backed up by actual policies and conventions, failing to get them across in every article you edit may be frustrating. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)]