If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 17:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
|
Stop recreating the Matthew Steel article - this person does NOT meet our criteria for an article. You've just recreated the article after TWO speedy deletions - do not re-create it again. Also DO NOT remove speedy deletion tags from articles you've created. If you continue in this manner you may well be BLOCKED from editing. Exxolon 18:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You have added the "genre"
Christian" to a number of articles recently. As you should be aware, Christian is not a musical genre; Christian rock, Christian metal etc etc however are. Please stop changing genres. Thank you
Nouse4aname 08:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop changing the
(talk) 19:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I see that I have warned you before and you ignored me completely. What is your problem? You're getting warnings now.
(talk) 19:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop changing the genres on every article you edit. You are not the authority on genres, and just because you are of the opinion the genre is wrong, does not allow you to change them. For the most part, genres are a rather contentious issue, and have usually been decided on by consensus. Your edits undermine this consensus and completely spoil the experience of wikipedia for everyone. If you want to change the genres, do so by first suggesting the change on the talk page (after checking any archive discussions first, to ensure the same discussion has not already occurred). Only after it has been discussed can the genre then be changed. Obvious vandalism is obviously the exception here. In addition, for album infoboxes, guidlines suggest that genres are separated by commas, and not line breaks. Please try to remember this to ensure consistency throughout wikipedia. Cheers. Nouse4aname (talk ) 10:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Look, I have asked politely many times before. Please ensure that your contributions use correct English spelling and punctuation. If you cannot do this, then you really shouldn't be contributing until you learn it. You have created the categories Stellar kart songs and Stellar kart albums; Stellar Kart is the name of a band, and thus is capitalised. Please remember this. Someone has to go around after you cleaning up your edits.
]
I have seen that you are adding the Category 2000s singles/ 2000s songs/ 2000s albums etc to many articles. Please don't. The articles only belong to the category of the specific year they were released. The category 2000s singles for example should only include the sub categories 2001 singles, 2002 singles...2008 singles ( up to 2009 singles in the future). Each of these sub categories then contains the relevant songs. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk ) 09:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
How many times must you be told. Do not add the following categories to articles:
2000s singles
2000s albums
2000s songs
1990s singles
1990s songs
1990s albums
These are simply used to collect the actual categories of, for example, 2001 singles, 2002 singles, 2003 singles etc
Please stop adding these categories to articles. I have asked politely, and in future you will be receiving warnings each time you ignore advice. If you continue editing in this way, you will soon be blocked. Please stop spoiling the experience for everyone else. Nouse4aname (talk ) 13:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
See here for an explanation. As all these articles already have the categroy for the specific year, for example 2001 albums, they do not also need to be included in the category 2000s albums. I hope that explains it.
Nouse4aname (
talk ) 13:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
In addition...
the categories American musical groups and musical groups are also redundant. These are simply parent categories that house the sub categories, for example, american punk bands etc. The categories should be as specific as possible. Not broad such as these. Please only stick to the specific categories. Over the coming weeks I plan to overhaul these categories, so don't be surprised to see them dissappear from the pages. Don't be tempted to add them back. Nouse4aname (talk ) 13:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted . If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox . Thank you. Chubbles (talk ) 15:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Chubbles (talk ) 19:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Chubbles (talk ) 19:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism . When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block.
-- Knowledge Of Self | talk 19:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I've now blocked you indefinitely. Knowledge Of Self | talk 23:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key , and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk ) 13:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Another editor has added the "{{
prod
}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion , where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
BJBot (
talk ) 00:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Prod
A
]
I have nominated Category:Acoustic music albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs ) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page . Thank you. —Justin (koavf) ❤T ☮C ☺M ☯ 21:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article I Wanna Live has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable song. No sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now? ) 14:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Definitely Maybe (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSONG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk ) 21:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article To the core has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced article on song fails WP:NSONG
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk ) 17:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Letters to the President (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk ) 13:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article
because of the following concern:
No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk ) 10:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Almost Here (The Academy Is song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unremarkable...an interesting composition and a few game appearances doesn't qualify its notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
oops 18:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
[ reply ]