User talk:Matt Oid

Hello, Matt Oid, my name is

• Wikipedia:Your first article
  - how to construct a great first article!
• Wikipedia:Cheatsheet
  - essential in learning about the different buttons you see when you click 'edit this page'.
• User:Matt Oid/Sandbox - your very own sandbox where you can fiddle around with the buttons on 'edit this page'.
• edit
  that page and ask!

I hope you enjoy being a

"arguably" is speculation. I fear this is the editor's opinion (which violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy) and not from a verifiable source. --Ghostexorcist 12:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree with you. But "arguably" is the same thing as "thought by some".

Then if the citation in the following sentence doesn't cover the sentence in question, it needs to be deleted altogether. I wasn't the person who originally added arguably in the lead. --Ghostexorcist 11:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The citation covers both sentences. "...arguably the most enigmatic people on our planet." is a direct quote from a scientific research paper on the genetic affinities of the Andamanese. You can follow the link for yourself if you like.

If it's a direct quote, why isn't it surrounded by parenthesis? The citation should be at the end of the first quote. And it should be stated that the info comes from a research paper. So, you could say, "One recent research paper states the negrito are 'arguably the most...'" --Ghostexorcist 10:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the citation covers both sentences.

Again, if it is a "direct citation", as you stated, it needs to be put in parenthesis. If not, it is considered plagiarism. It doesn't matter if it covers both sentences. Direct quotes have to be immediately cited. --Ghostexorcist 18:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A

Image:Negrito woman.jpg You wrote : Negrito Woman. But what country : Philippine ? It's important to precise the country, because you have negritos in malyasia, thailand and Andman Island (in front of Burma). Could you precise the origine, please ? Christophe Cagé

The article The Rain (Lou Rhodes song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tremble (song)

The article

Tremble (song) has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

No content, no references, no claim of notability, fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lou-Rhoudes-Tremble.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]