User talk:Maury Markowitz

Attention: Robots cannot post to this page.

Hello there,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mailplane (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailplane (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk)

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Bridging (programming).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nothing too important, just the QPQ.

Styyx (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually, it's two QPQs because we're in backlog mode, and it's important, because there's a seven-day deadline to supply QPQs once asked for, and this is day fourteen. Please provide two QPQs right away if you wish to pursue this nomination. Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am once again not receiving notifications, I see BM's but none others. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: [1] [2] [3] Andy Dingley (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maury Markowitz. Thank you for your work on

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On

15 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gloster P.370, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after years of development, the British thin-wing Javelin interceptor aircraft was cancelled in favour of purchasing the Canadian Avro Arrow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gloster P.370. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gloster P.370), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maury Markowitz. Thank you for your work on

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maury Markowitz. Thank you for your work on Bed of nails defense. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for bringing another interesting article to Wikipedia. The referencing is rather Garvin-heavy, but given that it was his idea, and that he had little support, I suppose that's not surprising. Good luck with the DYK proposal!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a fascinating quote in the reference you added...

"Since our own silo-killing force was to be housed in those very Minuteman silos which were assumed to be effec- tively destroyable by the Soviet Union, it was not clear how conversion of Minute- man to a force of silo killers would in itself counter that danger to the Minuteman force, except by the threat of preemptive attack. Indeed, were a force of Soviet silo killers really to materialize, it is likely that the Defense Department would request funds and approval to develop and deploy mobile ICBMs."

Basically, he posits that adding counterforce to Minuteman would actually be counter to the goal of giving the US flexibility, because it would demand the Soviets do the same thing with their missiles and thus increase the risks of a first-strike by either side. The calculus of nuclear war during that era is absolutely fascinating. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Register renaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accumulator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]