User talk:Medyamax

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references.

Please remove the code that puts this draft into small type, which makes it hard to read.

There is also a draft at Draft:Esther Nash. Was it created by the same author prior to registering an account?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Medyamax/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Medyamax, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft contains

peacock

language, such as 'Her message has always been "sparkle and shine like the super star you are!".'

Youtube and Pinterest are not reliable sources.

If Draft:Esther Nash was written by the same author, please request that one of the two drafts be deleted. If it was written by a different author, please coordinate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Esther Nash (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Esther Nash (2). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Esther Nash (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Medyamax. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]