, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!
Actually,I think it was User creation log, but not sure as it was a day ago, and I'm not young anymore. :) Joe I 23:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
oh, hehe, no I thought I had posted the welcome yesterday, lol, shows how bad my memory is. Yesterday was the first day I started welcoming, so I just assumed... :) Joe I 00:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox President
Hi. There has been a mess on that template. As a hot fix I've created template:Infobox President old. Please use that on all articles that you see broken. Many articles have already been converted to a new parameter set, so they now need the new version of Netoholic in order not to break. Adrian Buehlmann 02:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for your message. Please address further concerns regarding
Technically, you are correct. I added them to the stargate-stub category because I felt they all could be recognized as needing attention. There are some articles, such as Lost City, that probably do not fall under the category of stub-worthy. Yet I feel some articles either need more info, or less info. Personally I feel Lost City has to much info. You did a very good job of detailing to episode. Only general plot outlines is what I feel is necessary.
Solitudes (Stargate SG-1)
is an excellent example of how I feel a stargate episode should be.
Regardless, my personal feelings of how something should be is probably different from someone else. Hence, some I labeled as stubs so it could be brought to attention, and discussed.
Hello Meek Saffron - in national nominating conventions, shifts sometimes occur at the end of a ballot. They most frequently occur on the final ballot, but I know of one case in which a shift occurred at the end of a ballot though no one had been nominated. I don't know how familiar you are with the mechanics of national nominating conventions - we have not had a second ballot in a major party convention since 1956 so most people have not heard of shifting votes.
Here is an example of what I am talking about. In the Republican National Convention of 1860, Abraham Lincoln led on the third presidential ballot with 231.5 votes, with 233 needed for nomination. Four delegates who had voted for Chase switched their vote to Lincoln, which gave him a majority. Now that he had won, other delegates shifted their votes to him as well. After all the delegates who wanted to switch their vote had done so, Lincoln ended up with 340 votes to 126 for all others. That means that there are two tallies for the third ballot: the vote before shifts (Lincoln 49.7%) and the vote after shifts (Lincoln 73%). Chronicler3 00:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also I wanted to mention that in historic conventions, it is commonly the practice to declare the winner of the ballot nominated by acclamation. Historians usually do not recognize this as a shift of delegate votes, and in my research most accounts don't even mention it. Since the proceedings of most conventions are printed, though, the information appears there. Technically, this is a shifting of delegate votes also. Chronicler3 00:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you wanted a reason for my editing of the article, Elephant then I have one. I was doing what the peer review said. Daniel10 09:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Queen Elizabeth II
The Reagan addition is not relevant. The people mentioned are mentioned for a reason, especially George Bush Sr. If we were to go through every person
Queen Elizabeth II has met during her reign, we would have no space left. We also have too many fair-use images as it is, per Wiki standards. I hope you understand. Maddyfan 21:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tangent (Stargate SG-1).jpg)
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "