User talk:Mmarque

Hi, I nominated File:Akasofu.jpg, File:Nielsen.jpg, and File:Gerhard kramm.jpg for deletion as copyright violations and File:Nicole Molders.jpg for lacking a source. Regards Hekerui (talk) 22:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to July 8, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 03:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerhard Kramm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerhard Kramm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sailsbystars (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the AfD. But you will be more effective if you make a cogent case for retention there (as I assume you prefer), rather than a straight cut-and-paste. As it stands, your contrib is confusing. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mmarque. This is to make you aware that the

Please know that my message here is not meant to allege any misconduct on your part, but only to make you aware of the sanctions so that you can avoid trouble. Be mindful that anyone who engages in inappropriate behavior in this area may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Final decision section of the decision page.

It would be well to familiarise yourself with the information page at

I have raised this issue at

talk) 14:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

MMarque, could you please tone it down a bit? You're not helping your (or my) case over there. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ro Bailey.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the