User talk:MojtabaShahmiri

Hello and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a
  reliable sources
  .
• No
  abuse of multiple accounts
  .
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The

See Talk:Gutian language#Germanic Theory. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at

• diff: doublure of the Reich-quote; re-insertion of the IFLScience source which is full of errors
• diff: again the doublure of the Reich-quote
• diff, edit-summary It needs no explaining, this paragraph from Reich's book is itself the best objection to this theory. Which theory exactly? And which "objection"? A suggestion, just that.
• diff: do you actually understand what this is about? User:Skllagyook is totally right in his comments on this edit.
• diff: you're edit-warring here.

You better take serious notice of

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proto-Indo-European homeland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Please take these warnings seriously. Your Masters degree doesn't give you any authority here (and what is a "discontinued Masters?). If you are taken to

WP:ANI you'll probably be blocked. Doug Weller talk 14:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop the personal attacks, when you say my edits are disruptive, you should also say your reasons, having a difference of opinion is not disruptive. --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 14:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't a personal attack but a standard warning using a template, and User:Joshua Jonathan explained his reason. Meanwhile, you haven't answered my question about a "discontinued Masters" and you are making personal attacks - warning below. Doug Weller talk 10:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're pov-pushing again at Middle Bronze Age migration and Talk:Middle Bronze Age migration for your Iranian origins. Please stop it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I asked my question on your talk page but it seems you removed it! --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 08:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. I, and others too, have already explained to you: you interpret a number of sources in an odd way, pushing your convincion of Iranian origins of Indo-European. The evidence you see is not there. Wikipedia is not a

WP:FORUM. I don't doubt at all your good intentions, and I sincerely hope you can find another platform to discuss your ideas, but please not here at Wikipedia. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Would you please tell me what you interpret when for example David Reich says "the most likely location of the population that first spoke an Indo-European language was south of the Caucasus Mountains, perhaps in present-day Iran or Armenia"? Articles in the latest volume of the Journal of Indo-European Studies also talk about the same thing, I actually think you are pushing your belief of Steppe origins of Indo-European by ignoring all other theories, especially the recent ones. I don't want to discuss about it but I just want that these new studies are mentioned in Wikipedia. --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 09:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reich's comment is mentioned, at several places; you're making too much out of it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MojtabaShahmiri. You have been told this before, but

In future, please make sure that when you make a comment on a talk page you a) have a specific suggestion for or comment on an improvement to the article and b) provide a reference to

Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to use your editing rights primarily to engage in debates

@Joe Roe: When I edit something, you revert my edits and say first you should talk about it in the talk page and when I talk about it then you say Wikipedia is not a forum!! As I said here: Talk:Proto-Indo-European_homeland#Eurocentric_bigotry_in_this_page_about_Proto-Indo-European_homeland the problem seems to be Eurocentric bigotry in Wikipedia, what should I do when they revert my edits which are from peer-reviewed academic journal of Indo-European studies? Look at it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proto-Indo-European_homeland&diff=prev&oldid=933173128 --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Proto-Indo-European homeland, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan: I did it but you are not impartial towards me. --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Skllagyook. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You are heading for a block if you don't take heed of the multiple warnings you've had. Doug Weller talk 10:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't attack anyone but just asked them to stop POV-pushing. --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did comment "on other contributors" though, right? That's a standard template, not a personal message and reflects

assume good faith

"

• Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it.
• If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Linear Gutian, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proto-Indo-European homeland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MojtabaShahmiri. Based on this discussion and the your creation of Draft:Linear Gutian, it would appear that you might have a conflict of interest regarding the topic "Linear Gutian". Following is a standard notice about Wikipedia's policy concerning Conflict of interest. Please take the time to read and understand it:

Please pay especial attention to the third bullet about

@Mathglot: I already know about it and I have never used my own works for editing pages in the recent months, anyway thanks for your advice. MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 20:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FRINGE.Heiro 20:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Heironymous Rowe: I have never done it too, I just want that what scholars say are pulished in wikipedia, not what some editors interpret, as you read in the talk page of "Proto-Indo-European homeland" article, other ones have also complained about it. MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 21:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the ANI discussion about you [1] with a

@Ymblanter: Ok, but please be impartial, the main reason that I was banned was that I said "Southern archaic PIE-homeland hypothesis" is wrong, will you ban other ones who also say this southern of nowhere (!) hypothesis is wrong? Why should it not be corrected?! --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 04:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If someone opens the discussion about other users, and the consensus is to topic-ban them, I will be happy to evaluate the consensus and topic-ban each of them.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– Joe (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Why?!! --MojtabaShahmiri (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, MojtabaShahmiri. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]