User talk:Moneykandan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Noor Jahan Mango, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.newdelhinews.net/story/372923. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 15:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Noor Jahan Mango, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newdelhinews.net/story/372923 and http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/enviornment/rarest-of-mangoes-only-four-noor-jahan-trees-left_10062112.html. As a copyright violation, Noor Jahan Mango appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Noor Jahan Mango has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Noor Jahan Mango and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Noor Jahan Mango with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the
    CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Noor Jahan Mango
    .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing copyright issues

This article began as a copy of [1], and the new version remains an unusable unauthorized derivative work of that source.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be

permission is provided
, we can use the original text with proper attribution.

Please let me know if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update regarding copyright concern

Since we do not yet have verification of

Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee
. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. MLauba (Talk) 00:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Moneykandan, and

original research
in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the

helpme
}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page
. Again, welcome!  nsaum75¡שיחת! 11:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]