User talk:Morel

Thanks, I will certainly use these rights for reverting vandalism only.--Morel (talk) 16:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say thanks for the quick reverts of the vandalism on my talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!--Morel (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request in the edit summary here [1] I restored back to here[2] Hoping this is the correct version. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!--Morel (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I took the liberty of tagging User talk:69annieapple69 with a level 3 joke warning for their Merkin edits. Have a good day.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the page where joke warning templates are found if you need them:

Thanks! I will try to use them when necessary.--Morel (talk) 10:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wonder why you self-reverted there. Talk pages are specifically not intended to vent one's opinion about the subject of an article (see

Sorry, I must have been lost for a moment. It's probably because I usually try to avoid reverting user talk pages unless I see obvious vandalism. I now see that this comment may have been reverted.--Morel (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• It's not a user talk page, but an article talk page, being attacked by an IP troll. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry, my fault.--Morel (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user repeatedly included the sentence "They rape her and she is later rescued by Dumbledore." Although "supported" by two citations ([3] and [4]), I consider this as vandalism, as it presents an interpretation of the situation, and no rape is mentioned in the text.--Morel (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Humaniora Tartuensia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Humaniora Tartuensia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own

Hello, Morel. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morel. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morel. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a long time ago you took part in discussing a merge proposal at Talk:Circe the result of which was not to merge the larger Circe in the Arts with it. Another editor has now made that merge without consensus and reopened the discussion. Since you were a dissenting party originally, you may care to make a comment here. Sweetpool50 (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pablo Miller has been proposed for deletion. As you suggested the article at User:Morel/sandbox, you might like to contribute to the discussion. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]