User talk:Morning buzz

December 2007

History of video game consoles (seventh generation), without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

History of video game consoles (seventh generation), you will be blocked from editing. Thingg (talk) 16:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Re: History of video game consoles (seventh generation) talk page

I thought I would respond here so I know that you will get this message.
First of all, please do not make personal attacks against the author of an article. Doing so will not help you at all and can weaken your position by making people less likely to listen to your ideas. Also, I just looked over the sections in question and I do not see any pro-PS3 slant in them. The only things mentioned about the PS3 in the Xbox 360's section are about games/features that were superior on the 360 (and inferior on the PS3), and some games that were formerly PS3 exclusive that were subsequently released on the 360 as well. As for mentioning the comments deriding the 360 for lack of backwards compatibility, those were made by Sony officials BEFORE they decided to remove BC in the PS3 and were thus a valid argument at the time. (If anything, they make Sony look dumb because they are now doing the same thing they criticized the 360 for.)
Anyway, I hope this message clears up any issues you had with the article, but if it doesn't, you are more than welcome to edit the article to make it less biased.
Thanks, Thingg 20:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]