User talk:MountainRose

On 2 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ovulatory shift hypothesis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that women's sexual preferences and attractiveness may shift across their ovulatory cycles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ovulatory shift hypothesis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ovulatory shift hypothesis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

Hi, great to see you're alive and editing... Could you let me know when you plan to begin work on the GA review? I have only made a few comments so it shouldn't be arduous. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Hi there! Thanks so much for the comments and for agreeing to do the review. I will start addressing all of the issues today. I know many of the issues concern the references and I completely agree with all of those points. I used the DOI or ISBN reference generator to create all of the citations and was pretty appalled at how poorly many of them were generated. I was doing some research on how to fix them but the holidays got in the way and I haven't been able to get back to it until now. It may take me some time to fix all of them to my perfectionist standards, but I will let you know when I have addressed at least most of your points. It shouldn't take more than a day or two. Thanks again!

The article Ovulatory shift hypothesis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ovulatory shift hypothesis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is a note to ask: would you be interested in submitting the Ovulatory shift hypothesis article for external, academic peer review to improve its accuracy and generate a citable publication?

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) aims to couple the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

The WP:WikiJournal article nominations page should allow simple submission of existing Wikipedia pages for external review. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 03:53, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

1. Fill in the 'article info' template at the top (often easiest in VisualEditor)
2. Fill in the authorship declaration form to submit as ready for external peer review to be organised.

Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 08:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you may wish to be aware of a discussion about the article Ovulatory shift hypothesis: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Ovulatory shift hypothesis. Crossroads ^-talk- 06:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]