User talk:Mu5sic5

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More work to be done, along the lines suggested by the reviewer comments.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:C.W. O'Connor (Composer)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:C.W. O'Connor (Composer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mu5sic5! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deb (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mu5sic5,

Thank you for creating John Wilbank.

Looks good, though some of the references aren't formatted properly -- see Help:Referencing for beginners or compare to similar articles for a guide on how to format them properly.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingenuity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources offered in article attest to subject being a musician whose notability was very local. Two brief reviews appear in The Etude, but other cited sources from there consist of ads peddling subject's music. The rest of the articles only verify that he was involved with a performance, but offer no further comment; neither the performances were notable, nor were the other participating musicians.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:George Tompkins (composer)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:George Atwater (composer). Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello TechnoSquirrel. According to the Wiki 'Criteria for composers and lyricists', this figure meets the following:

1.Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition (composer of Ragtime standard, "African Dreamland: Intermezzo" and contributor to Yale University's "Boola" song)

Others

Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable music sub-culture. ( Berlin, Edwin (2002). Ragtime: A Musical and Cultural History; Weinstein, Norman (1992). A night in Tunisia : imaginings of Africa in jazz

-Mu5sic5 Mu5sic5 (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Karnataka were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all sources are trivial mentions, ie. the catalogs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:George Atwater (composer)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Karnataka,

The question would be, if catalogs are not suited, should they be removed entirely? These are more for reference for the reader as to where published works can be found through the copyright office. Almost none of Victor Record's records were thoroughly 'reviewed' unless they were Classical music records. An exception to the Classical music rule would be music publisher Friedrich Hofmeister https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Hofmeister_Musikverlag republished this work in Germany during its' popularity in the United States. For a record to be recorded in these early stages of sound reproduction, the song or performance in question had to have some popularity, otherwise it wouldn't sell. This piece 'African Dreamland: Intermezzo' was recorded until 1912: a nine-year market. It is important to note, this subgenre was looked down upon in its' time and perhaps was not reviewed in 'music journals' or other for that reason. Neither was the music of Scott Joplin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Joplin, the founder of Ragtime, in his time. But had a resurgence years later among enthusiasts of this sub-genre, by authors such as Edwin Berlin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_A._Berlin and jazz scholar Norman C. Weinstein. These two authors specifically talk about this primary notable work, as historically significant, and not in a passing mention. The second work in question was this figure's connection to Yale University's fight songs, specifically where he was a contributor to the Boola song https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boola_Boola, one of the highest selling and most popular songs of the early 1900s. Arrangers and publishers of this college-style music were particularly overlooked because much of the time, they were actually the composer. I am not stating this as fact, but a relevant factor.

-Mu5sic5 Mu5sic5 (talk) 01:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies exclusively on trivial mentions, announcements of performances or events (

WP:ROUTINE

), and catalogues, none of which is enough for establishing notability. Consider using biographies about the subject, in depth reporting, or reviews of the subject's works as sources instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:George Tompkins (composer)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Atwater (composer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 21:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mu5sic5. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Tompkins (composer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mu5sic5. Thank you for your work on

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stanleigh P. Friedman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will Corbett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 09:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mu5sic5. Thank you for your work on

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]