User talk:Nafeessiddique

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Nafeessiddique, and

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 16:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Sources failed verification, moving to draftspace. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to talk to you about your edits on Mirza Khizr Sultan. I noticed you added a lot of information about Khizr Sultan's descendants. Could you please also add references for this new information? Thanks Alivardi (talk) 19:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nafeessiddique, please also write more coherently if you can. Your edits are borderline incomprehensible, looking almost like word salad with improper punctuation. — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing all this do you have any problem..if you want to see reference or prove you can go To Rampur Raza library or Istanbul Museum.. Nafeessiddique (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realise you have been replying. Could you please notify my page next time to let me know?

The issue is, that it is your responsibility to provide proof for your assertions. It is not the job of a reader of the article to verify your claims. Your "jewelry", as you mentioned in the other thread, isn't an appropriate source. I am happy to help you with writing the article, but I need you to please reference reliable sources. Alivardi (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've already mentioned the Rampur Raza Library, could you please name the book you had mind? Along with the author and publication year? Please, that is all I need. Alivardi (talk) 10:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Alivardi (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you want to be create a environment regarding Great Empires of the world if you don't want to give correct information for the people then we don't need to go Sach type of one sided world in which everything information according to Deep state who is ruling the real world just like they did in past during University of Qurtba every documents Steeled and then a rule passed by Government that everyone should go to patent his discovery in the Royal Scientific Society . So Don't worry we have historical evidence of documentation .. which is our Jewelry.. Nafeessiddique (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nafeessiddique: I am not removing anything. I am helping you fix your articles. I enjoy reading about medieval history and appreciate your contributions. But, please write properly use correct English punctuation, grammar, and sentence structure. That is all we're asking of you. If you need help with copyediting, then please get a friend to help you out with improving your writing before actually posting on Wikipedia. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mirza Khizr Sultan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 12:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's been discussed by the community. Please don't use it. Doug Weller talk 12:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirza Muhammad Khanbahadur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Muhammad Khanbahadur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 12:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Alivardi (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nafeessiddique. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mirza Alla-ud-din Muhammad Khizer Shah Alemgir ll, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Nafeessiddique. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]