User talk:Naiele3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpha Kappa Omicron (September 19)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the

reliable sources

that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Naiele3/sandbox/Alpha Kappa Omicron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Naiele3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpha Kappa Omicron (October 12)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the

reliable sources

that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alpha Kappa Omicron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Teahouse/Questions

As the banner at my talk page says, if I have declined your

the Teahouse for the advice of other experienced editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Draft:Alpha Kappa Omicron concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alpha Kappa Omicron, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 01:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Alpha Kappa Omicron

Hello, Naiele3. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Alpha Kappa Omicron

".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alpha Kappa Omicron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Kappa Omicron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Omicron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Hi Naiele3. Please check your Common's user talk page. I have posted something there about a file you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The gang of Amazons

The article

The gang of Amazons has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Possibly a speedy candidate. Clearly an un-suitable title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

talk) 02:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

please see the talk page for this article, my reasons are outlined there. Naiele3 (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution

. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

There is a reason why this was done. The articles found on Inessa were not solely on her, but of her as a member of the group. For instance, regarding Bonnie and Clyde, two separate article for each persona does not exist, as they were known and gained notoriety as a pair. They have one page that explains BOTH of their exploits. In this case, part of the information was copied and pasted as a template, but further research was done to expand on the topic. I just did not know how to change the name of the article without just completely moving it. Naiele3 (talk) 05:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Naiele3. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of One Young World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Young World, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Young World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]