User talk:Naleksuh

May I know what you tried doing here? First of all you should not have closed any discussion here. You could have given your opinion as a comment or reply. And you are not supposed to remove content from the Teahouse, as you did with my comment. Can you please specify what you wanted to do there? ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 08:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Itcouldbepossible: Apologies for removing your comment. I saved over an edit conflict. Naleksuh (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Naleksuh Ok no problem. But please be careful from next time when you are choosing which edition to keep. Thanks. Merry Christmas. ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 04:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naleksuh, I saw your post at the Teahouse and noticed two things:

• Signatures: Signatures go at the end of your post. You leave your signature by typing 4 ~'s like so: ~~~~ (as it appears when viewing this page), and the software behind Wikipedia will do the rest for you. You can also press
  in the toolbar while your cursor is at the end of your post.
• Minor edits: The minor edit checkbox is reserved for uncontroversial edits that don't need to be seen and where its okay when they don't appear on auto-generated lists such as Special:RecentChanges or the watchlist
  . Leaving a new post on a talkpage is never a minor edit.

Merry Christmas, Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Schmidt Actually they had messed up with the closing of a Teahouse post. See this and this. They also closed my question. So, I corrected everything. I added the section "Comment by Naleksuh" there. And since, they had not written it themself, I did not sign it. That is what had happened. I hope you understand me. Merry Christmas. ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 15:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Naleksuh, I'd like to monitor the link additions to Wikipedia for the user's website for a while, to see if the promotion is implemented by someone. Could you email me the URL if one has been specified? Thanks in advance! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: I did not ask for, nor receive, the website in question. Naleksuh (talk) 17:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:RS explaining that in order for Wikipedia to cite their website it needs to be credible. They said something like "Oh, it's okay if it's not credible" (okay for you, but not okay for us..). I also mentioned that MediaWiki uses nofollow links and it will not boost their SEO, at which point I never heard back. It sounds like I shouldn't have closed the Teahouse discussion, I know that on other places that is done but maybe not there. Just didn't want to spend Christmas bothering with it, but now I know how Teahouse works. Hope you are doing well. Naleksuh (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Ah, no worries! My message also wasn't about any mistakes done when replying to them. I had just hoped that the user has e-mailed you a link to their website, and I'd have checked if that link appears somewhere on Wikipedia. It was just an idea, nothing necessary. :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naleksuh, Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I saw you said you had COVID symptoms, and meant to say get well soon in my reply, and then forgot by the time I got to the end of my sentence, and now it looks like I'm a coldhearted jerk who doesn't care! Get well soon. Not rude, just increasingly forgetful. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​ Thanks, I thought you ignored it because this was too serious a project or something. I am feeling much better today but still a little out of it. I hope you are doing alright, stay safe. Naleksuh (talk) 15:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I get that you don't like the acronym XRV, but going around unilaterally changing it isn't the way to go about raising that. And honestly, I think the more pressing issue is people trying to smother the process before it gets going, not what three or four letters we use to link to it. I'd rather not have to hold a straw poll about such a trivial and subjective issue when all that is going on, so can you please give the people who suggested and created the process the courtesy of letting them picking its initial name? – Joe (talk) 08:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​ Fair enough. For full disclosure, when you reverted my page moves you didn't move the associated talk pages. Just letting you know incase you want to move those too. Naleksuh (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Naleksuh. You are mistaken about the internal comment at {{

Oh, I see. It's been updated now. Sorry for my mistake, oops. Naleksuh (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary I did. Naleksuh (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"stop tagbombing" isn't a valid edit summary, norna valid reason to remove valid maintenance tags. You also removed other valid content without explanation. BilCat (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single source automatically includes includes needs more sources; having both is tag bombing Naleksuh (talk) 19:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the "needs more sources" tag means that there is unsourced content on the page, or content which is not supported by the provided sources. The "single source" tag means that the sourced content is largely based on one source. It is not "tagbombing" to have individual tags covering an article's different problems. - ZLEA _T\^C 00:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not state how "Grand Theft Alvarado" came to be. Please cite a source if and when you restore. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 05:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit would that be? So far as I know, I removed content from the page (removing vandalism), not added new unsourced content. So I am confused. Naleksuh (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You who are the admin of the Miraheze interface. Part of the click from there that rules everything. Just a question. How do you agree that I am blocked by edit war and Agent Isai is not? Strange huh? After all, he got into it and I use Rollback for edits that weren't vandalism or spam. --YellowFrogger Pixial (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]