User talk:Naught101

since this is doubled up, I'll remove it. if you want to check out the discussion go to: Talk:Architecture

I see that you are an inexperienced editor. It is a judgement call whether something is off topic, or informative context. Fortunately, rules are more relaxed on the talk page than on the article page, so we don't need to make that judgement. --Silverback 23:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

no problem. just thought that pollution/consumption wasn't exactly that important to architecture. I thought others might get bored, but if you're happy to make that call, I agree.--Naught101 01:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ref your new image at

You can write a reply on my Talk page. Also, WELCOME to the 'pedia and all that. :) Here are some Australia links you might find useful:

• WP:AWNB
  Australian Wikipedians' notice board
• WP:SYD
  WikiProject Sydney, editors getting together to collaborate on Sydney-related articles

cheers, pfctdayelise 12:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hrrmm... should have looked at the history and talk pages huh? sorry people. further reply at

Template talk:Australian Flags --naught101 12:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Do you really want another red link on your user page? I don't understand why you're voting delete. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 03:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I voted delete as I feel that's what's appropriate. I don't particularly care about userboxes, and I don't really think they are all that appropriate to an encyclopedia. And I'd also thank you not to privately lobby people on their user pages, as that's exactly what the problem with userboxes entails. keep it to the Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions. cheers. --naught101 03:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I am proposing that the

good idea, replied on Talk:Lake Cowal. --naught101 23:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addition of the sustainable travel section to Sustainable tourism. It is important for people to know just how their travel affects the environment. I am a big picture person, and not aware the specific facts. If you have any specific details on how tourism affects the environment (or culture or economy), the page could use some additions.

Hi Naught101. I know that you've been involved in wikifying articles in the past, so I thought I'd draw your attention to this new project. We currently have a backlog of over 6500 articles, so any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated, even if it's only one or two articles! Alternatively, if you know anyone else who might like to help out, please tell them about it. Thanks :) -Ladybirdintheuk 09:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ladybird, sorry, but I have very little time. I applaud you efforts, and will help out by wikifying articles that I find that need it when I can, but I can't commit to helping, sorry. good luck --naught101 03:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{

List of attacks on free speech has also been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

it seems like the discussion on the merging of anarchy and anarchism is winding to a close over here. wondering if you'd like to audit the results so we can move forward on ths issue. thanks! -- frymaster 19:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can you belong to Category:

I try. but that was a mistake, thanks for pointing it out. fixed.--naught101 09:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ArchimedesScreenShot.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article TiN Radio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, non-wikified article that fails to assert notability. The url in the external links section is not registered. Doesn't appear to be an actual radio station.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ArchimedesScreenShot.png

section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

distance correlation image

You recently added an image of correlation examples with distance correlation computed. It appears that you (or some other editor) has corrected the R code provided with it as suggested in my message on the talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Correlation_examples2.svg. Appreciate the correction.

The image is interesting, but the prominent display there on Distance correlation probably suggests a direct comparison with Pearson correlation statistics is appropriate, which is not the case. The correlation and distance correlation really cannot be compared directly except in a few special cases such as when cor=1 or for the bivariate normal (in that case there is a deterministic relation of r² with dcor²). In general, however, it is difficult to interpret the degree of association by reading the value of the dcor statistic. Mathstat (talk) 05:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the heads up Mathstat. My stats knowledge is pretty limited, and I've only just come across distance correlation. I basically just made the image to help myself get my head around the concept, and I thought it might be useful on wikipedia. Sounds like it still might be, if someone changes the caption appropriately? Please do, if you can think of a way.

I didn't change the code at all, except to change cor to dcor() and to create another row with reduced spread in y, or in y and x, where it seemed appropriate. Maybe someone else did? --naught101 (talk) 12:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take another look. You are right about the caption. I am not sure what else to write, but I'll try to come up with something later. I agree that the image is helpful (actually the bivariate case is the only one we can easily visualize, although dcor is good for arbitrary dimensions). It does appear that someone corrected the code at the line [ x = runif(n, -1, 1) ] for generating the first sample. This has little effect on the shape of the clouds but it is important so that the data is a random sample (x, y) and not a time series. I had a hard time following the history because apparently that is on Wikimedia, where I did not even have an account until yesterday or so. Anyway, thanks for adding the image.Mathstat (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IPO

I have

Initial Public Offering, so incoming links will not factor into the discussion. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Reference errors on 25 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Herpes labialis page, your edit caused an ISSN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 00:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Mutual Information

Hello - could you respond to the removal of your diagram on the mutual information page? Thanks PAR (talk) 17:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Naught101. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Naught101. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Naught101. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]