User talk:Ndchriste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Map

Hi, I was just using a template which I didn't really put together. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SK election map

Hey, by any chance do you have a map of the 1991 Saskatchewan election results? I see you have one for the 1995 election so I'm hoping you maybe have a 1991 in storage? Dodge rambler (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Athabasca Article merger

There is a lake located at approx. 54.5 degrees north, and 107.8 degrees west called "Île-à-la-Crosse". My theory is that the Athabasca riding was split in two in 1917 - the northern 3/4s named after Lac Île-à-la-Crosse, and the southern part named after a "Jackfish Lake", 19 km north of North Battleford (plausible?). In 1934, the Athabasca riding regained its old name, while Jack Fish Lake was renamed Meadow Lake.

Thoughts? Jwkozak91 (talk) 06:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Election maps

Thanks very much for doing the 1991 election map. By any chance would it be possible for you to redo the existing 2003 and 2007 SK election maps? I'm afraid that even with the legend provided it's very difficult, for me at least, to tell by looking at the map which ridings went to which party. Dodge rambler (talk) 17:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manitoba maps (1958-1966)

Thanks for putting up maps from this period - however, I'm a little confused about which district is which. Could you put up a legend or key indicating the names of the ridings? (18 Nov 2009) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.78.21 (talk) 08:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Brandon East.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ndchriste. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Dawson Trail.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:DawsonTrail2011.jpg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]