User talk:Nefesf9

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 17:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the issue: although you have done some positive work, you were advised to NEVER remove the CSD tags from an article - in fact, you were advised how to possibly save the article from deletion. You decided to continue removing them - THAT is considered vandalism. You'll note that a few of those articles remain as stubs, and are no longer in danger of being deleted. The article about penguins? What was up with that? It has no sense being on an encyclopedia. So, add your removal of CSD tags contrary to your warnings, and the creation of a page that has no business here, you are blocked until you can convince the community that you understand policy, and will not continue to either vandalize or create articles that don't belong. (

BWilkins ←track) 20:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

How can I convince the community ? please telll me Nefesf9 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I come to wikipedia to write articles. not to have lots of red flags shoved in my face. i have been blocked for writing three articles and trying not to get them deleted and having the valueable information within them destroyed. everyone here sems to hate me because i'm new and because i can't speak English very well this is sad. all the articles i write were good enough to keep, but i can't edit them beacuse im blocked after a few hours for trying to better wikipedia. i am very sad that wiki is so bad. @@@@@

also i try my hardest on the pages i edited to do what people asked - like i translated from lithuanian the lithuanian Wikipedia's page on a prime minsiter. this is all bad. can you delete all my articles please ? !

See above - and please learn to sign all of your posts on talkpages with ~~~~ (

BWilkins ←track) 20:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

i am prepared to do all of this - i have read what wikipeidia is not and the notability page, and I have read the pillars thin in the top of the page. Nefesf9 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC) also, you want to see Vytautas Sakalauskas and its talk ? I really edited it well just before i was banned to improve it.[reply]

i wish people took some more care over how me as a new person was treated, as it seems that I am being blocked, and not-unblocked simply because people have misunderstanded me.

im waiting for ever for people to tell me whether i can be blocked or not. this is crazy. can you just get on and unblock me or pernamently block me. im trying to follow the rules but you wont give me a chance. Nefesf9 (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following our conversation above, I have contacted the blocking Admin recommending an unblock. Please be patient; it has to be done this way. --

^"talk" 20:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

ok, sorry for being a bit rushed about all this. i'm just a bit annoyed about the whole thing.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): On the basis of your undertaking Request handled by: "talk" Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Please do not add

Nice article! Do you plan on finishing it? Let me know if you need help -- I am sorry to see you got in so much trouble. Renata (talk) 16:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i'm fine with creating the actual article, but it would be great if you watched it and told me if I was breaking guidelines and policys. it would probably be quite hard for you to improve it, because all the references are in Lithuanian and off the internet. Nefesf9 (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i see you can speak lithuanian, how do you put those boxes on your page ? you can help if you want, but i have already got the books and papers. if you are in America, it would probably be hard for you to find some of them. it would be more useful if you just checked that i havent made obvius mistakes. thank you Nefesf9 (talk) 19:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I am a Lithuanian living in United States so I would not have access to printed Lithuanian books. But I'll check the article for obvious errors. See WP:Babel on how you can add the language boxes. For example, if you wanted to indicate that you are native Lithuanian and intermediary English speaker, the code would be {{Babel|lt|en-2}}. Renata (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some things you may want to consider for next steps, I am not really sure of the suggested order, but I think:

• Wikipedia:Guide for nominating good articles
  (I think this would be first)
• Wikipedia:Peer review (after the concerns of the Good Article status have been meet, then a peer review by subject matter "experts" can help focus clean up and expansion on the way to Featured Article status)

Good Luck! Active Banana (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to go to a couple of

Wikipedia:FA#Art.2C_architecture_and_archaeology about artists and see what they look like, and gain inspriation for what is missing and could be added to the article that you are working on. (the talk pages probably have links to the Good Article / Featured article discussions where you could see what concerns the reviewers had.) Active Banana (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I dont know if you were able to find this, its kind of hidden: [[1]]. Its the discussion process that the editors went through to bring your sample article up to the GA standards. Active Banana (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articles need to "fully cover the subject" to reach the GA standard. That generally requires that a number of reliable sources have covered many aspects of the subject and that our article makes use of all of their work. Artists can sometimes be longer articles because we would have sources that cover the life of the artist and sources that cover the artists works - whereas say a politician or sports person, the life and the work are often pretty much the same. Active Banana (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: the image at

ok, ill do it as soon as I can. Nefesf9 (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nefesf9. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply