User talk:Nestofbirdnests

Hello, Nestofbirdnests, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please
  talk pages
  , by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
    if you wish)
  • Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 09:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  
  
  
  

==References==
{{Reflist}}

I am quite familiar with North American linguistics and am surprised by the Shuxelk language article. Could you please cite sources? Nothing shows up on Google despite multiple searches. The article may be deleted as a hoax if no citations are provided. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 18:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Fdom5997 (talk) 02:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Fdom5997 (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to the above notice, I do not see any thread about you at

WP:AN. —C.Fred (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Can you help me create a thread please? Fdom5997 (talk) 02:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• You failed to provide an edit summary to explain why you removed the source in the linked edit to Páez language. Please make sure to provide edit summaries that explain your edits. —C.Fred (talk) 02:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• If you're going to claim that a source is fake, you now need to explain that at the article's talk page and provide counter-sources. —C.Fred (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mochica language. If you're going to claim that a source is fake, you need to go to the talk page and back it up. Either provide your sources or have your edits treated as baseless disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nestofbirdnests. Thank you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nestofbirdnests. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

is closed. One of your socks was blocked today, so this is the poster child for bad-faith requests. The six month clock resets to November 24, 2023. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Checkuser block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]