User talk:NeveudeRameau

No opinion of the CUP translation? Mtevfrog 12:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, let me congratulate and thank you for your excellent work on the Friedrich Nietzsche and related articles. A few points you might want to keep in mind:

1. Correctly-used images improve articles, and should be included where relevant and possible. For example, you replaced images used in
   Genealogy of Morality and Beyond Good and Evil with superior images instead of moving the inferior images to different sections. You also deleted wholesale images of book covers from the Friedrich Nietzsche
   article when they vastly improved the quality of the section. Images should only be removed if their copyright status is controversial, when they are irrelevant to the section or when there are too many images in a given section.
2. Another point to consider is when editing a page, a small "Summary" field appears under the main edit-box and looks like this:

It's recommended to always fill in the summary field, as it helps everyone to understand what you have changed, such as when perusing the history of the page. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. I reverted your removal of several images because you did not explain why you removed them - had you explained why, I might have accepted your rationale. Providing edit summaries means other editors are much less likely to undo your work.

1. I notice you recently restructured the Beyond Good and Evil article by chapter headings. It appears you intend to give a detailed summary of each. This will not be tolerated - it is contrary to the quality standards of book articles. Please consider reading the guidelines for non-fiction books or look at one of the featured articles such as this one or this for an idea of what makes a brilliant non-fiction book article. Blow-by-blow accounts of chapters are unhelpful.

I urge you to take these points under consideration and wish you well in your future edits. Regards, Skomorokh ^incite 15:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading