User talk:New worl

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of people driving Tesla Roadster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people driving Tesla Roadster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people driving Tesla Roadster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I wanted to check in regarding your revert to the removal of unsourced info on the borderline personality disorder article. Before reverting the edit discussing Lena Dunham's character as having BPD, I first searched for sources to see if I could find one that supported the information, and there are currently no sources supporting it. If you can find a source for that information, that's wonderful -- I myself am always interested in the portrayal of mental health in television and movies! But since there are no sources at present, I think it's appropriate to remove the information from the article. Is that alright on your end?

Thanks, Firecatalta (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Firecatalta,

Thank you for emailing me. I think you are a very diligent Wikipedian. Please go ahead with your plan.

Best regards,

NW

Thanks! I do think your approach is right on the mark. It's far more constructive to support material with sources whenever possible than to just remove it. Have a wonderful Monday!

Best,

Firecatalta (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your last revert on Vélib'

Hi,

You reverted my last edit on the article Vélib', stating that my edit was "vandalism". Could you explain why? Slasher-fun (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slasher-fun,

Thank you for asking me. I saw "1" standing alone in a whole line as in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A9lib%27&oldid=549032817

Maybe a typo?

Cheers,

New worl

Rich Lesser

Please add independent references ASAP or this article may be deleted. Please read Wikipedia:Notability.Deb (talk) 10:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Deb very much. New worl (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Lesser AfD

Rich Lesser has now been nominated for deletion from Wikipedia. Qworty (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

I noticed you added italics around the quotations in this edit. Why did you do this? A

Hi Reywas92,

Thank you for asking me. I think italic would help readers go straight to the quote, which will help them in skimming. It is more helpful in long articles.

Please tell me your opinion.

Thank you. New worl (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's not the purpose of

italics. The length of an article doesn't matter; some material in a paragraph is a quote, and some isn't. It isn't our role here to help people skim: perhaps the quote isn't even the most important part of paragraph, and other material would be more helpful for skimming. In http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inner_peace&diff=550298224&oldid=540526457 this edit] to a very short article, the quote is already blocked off, so I don't see what the effect should be. I don't mean to admonish you, but just please don't do it any more. Reywas92^Talk 22:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I still believe that italic has many important benefits that have been used fully in Wikipedia. I will think more about this and may make some recommendation in the future. In the end, what is helpful to users will survive and thrive. Cheers, New worl (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some handy Wikipedia policies for you to be aware of and try to follow

Hi! Some of your recent edits have indicated that you could benefit from reading the following policies:

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Primark, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is exactly what I was talking about when I said:
I'm not sure if that is intended to be some kind of

Answered here. New worl (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relax and have yourself a cup of tea. Editing Wikipedia is not suppose to be so stressful. I apologize if I seemed BITEy to you at all and I hope our future communications can be positive and rewarding for both of us. Happy Editing! Technical 13 (talk) 00:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey New worl; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to

No problem,

HighKing. As you can see, I still need to learn many simple things. Have a good day or night! Cheers, New worl (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. Peace. Hopefully next time we bump into each other we'll be more aligned :-) --

HighKing (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I hope so. Each of us has only 24 hours a day. The sooner a consensus is reached, the better it is. New worl (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohel Rana (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohel Rana (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JamieSc (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zhou Dynasty philosophers is a subcategory of Category:Chinese philosophers... As such, it usually shouldn't also be in the parent category. --Nlu (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read the diffs before blindly stabbing the revert button. —

Are you Hispanic/Latino, well my family comes from Perú, and I do not know anything about you, oh, and BTW, why did you gve yourself a name of "New worl"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoymeyahMonlin (talk • contribs) 13:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi New worl! Since you're listed as a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]