User talk:NickCatal

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Note- Posts to this page have a very low chance of being seen or replied to

The article Anne Grauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't this article passes

WP:PROF

. Hence, proposing deletion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 15:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Catalano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Catalano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. edg ☺ ☭ 19:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Catalano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Catalano (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  crh ₂₃  (Talk) 18:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating IRC, NickCatal!

Wikipedia editor ThePromenader just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

the redirect here was replaced with an article, but I set it back to its former redirect status (leaving a note about it to the article author)

To reply, leave a comment on ThePromenader's talk page.

Learn more about

THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 15:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Brian Cox (physicist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Brian Cox (physicist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]