User talk:Nip888

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to

introduction to editing. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 02:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The recent edit you made to

Pinscreen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 02:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to

Pinscreen. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (Talk) 03:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Your blanking of the
Pinscreen page is likely to get you blocked from editing. If you would care do explain yourself, please put a message on this page. Thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

This is your last warning. If you

talk) 03:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Ward Fleming for deletion

The article Ward Fleming is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ward Fleming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

talk) 07:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

You have been
talk) 11:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nip888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have to cross reference ,I am editing to imrove the accuracy of the posts and keep it up to date. Nip888 (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nip888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I fully understand and studied the cause. thank you! Nip888 (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nakon 20:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nip888&oldid=1139480958"