User talk:Noway419

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

September 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Halo 3. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 17:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Halo 3, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TKD::Talk 17:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

neutral point of view at Halo 3. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block
by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I should also note that you also violated the

reliable sources, not Wikipedia editors, for points of view. — TKD::Talk 17:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dumluckart.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JOELPACK.gif

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noway419 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

ok i learned the wikipedia rules which i have never read b4 and i realize my mistakes now and think i deserve another chance to edit, most of my edits are just to rpevent vandalism from my fav bands page so im sorry if there was any rule i violated but i no them now and it wont happen again so some1 unban me now plz Noway419 (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Obviousness of the similarity of the two accounts aside, your behavior here (changing others' comments) has been disruptive. — — TKD::Talk 04:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to admins User was blocked as a sock puppet, not for inserting POV material. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


By the way, I have a life. If I had no life, I'd be dead, wouldn't I? And one does not have to be an admin to place a sock puppet tag on a userpage. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

when did i say i was tlaking about u...Noway419 (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty obvious. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected, and you would be unable to communicate with others. Do not remove the sock puppet tag. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you make any more unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected
, and you would be unable to communicate with others.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. ♠PMC(talk) 11:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]