User talk:OlaLj

Hi. To let you know - you are covering up and protecting that IDSA guidelines is not working. You also are deleting that WHO codes says indirectly that chronic lyme do exist. You are also by deleting covering up that HHS.gov has criticized IDSA. People all over the world including small helpless children are suffering, people commits suicide because of IDSA etc, why are covering up? OlaLj (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing you have posted is from a reliable source in accordance with

WP:MEDRS. It is a baseless conspiracy theory. ScienceFlyer (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

How can you says that for example WHO or HHS is conspiracy theories?

And the validated German study etc?

On what evidence based grounds do you stand on saying that? OlaLj (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:OlaLj reported by User:ScienceFlyer (Result: ). Thank you. ScienceFlyer (talk) 01:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OlaLj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason why I was blocked - "did not appear to be constructive" - is indeed constructive. My edits contains important information and links to and from HHS.gov and others who criticises IDSA treatment guidelines. OlaLj (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused. You are blocked for edit warring. See

WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for confusion is that it is the wrong user, me, who is blocked for edit war. The war was initially started from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScienceFlyer for deleting facts from HHS.gov and other reliable sources saying IDSA:s guidelines is not working.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Misrepresenting sources, clear agenda pushing, and immediate pushing of FRINGE ideas. Nope, none of this is welcome here. Courcelles (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OlaLj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1.Misrepresenting sources. I copied text from sources, how can that be "misrepresenting"? 2. "clear agenda pushing",since my sources as HHS.gov or U.S department of health got deleted yes I pushed them back just as ScienceFlyer "pushed" them away. 3 "immediate pushing of FRINGE ideas". I tried to translate FRINGE, all I got was a TV serie and hairstyling. If FRINGE ideas is some kind of an accusation that should then be directed to HHS.gov or other reliable sources or such as U.S department of health that I linked to and qouted. OlaLj (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you still do not seem to understand the issues here, there are no grounds to remove the block. At this time I do not see a pathway forward if you want to edit about medical related topics. 331dot (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If WIKI does not want to have relevant info from HHS.gov and such as source regarding strong critics from them against IDSA:s treatment guidelines does science says - IDSA guidelines does not work and why, then people and children will be left tortured w/o any help all almost all over the world since the world follows IDSA:s guidelines. The interesting thing here since ticks before laid approx 2 000 eggs they now due warmer climate lays around 6.000 eggs. So this is a hidden pandemic and sooner or later everyone will be terrible sick or someone close and then zero help from public care because public sources and other reliable sources who criticize IDSA:s guidelines gets shuts down like here now at WIKI. This is just one example of critics, HHS.gov; "The belief that Lyme is resolved outright after the IDSA guideline treatment, preventing patients from managing persistent Lyme symptoms and making future plans around their condition."

And WIKI sadly decides to hide this in favor for IDSA so extremely vital info for millions of people all over the world.