User talk:Onel5969/Archive 61

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 49: December 2018

Just dropped by to say I noticed you reviewed seven pages I've been working on...so I wanted to say thanks! Seahawk01 (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries, Seahawk01 - keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

• I'm Real Cambodian I'm Trying to Restore My Cultures After War Destroyed Why You Do That ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reach999 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Because your a sock, and you have continued to vandalize the page for quite a few months. Don't ever write on my talk page again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Mirwais Azizi. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Many thanks for your service. Serenesage (talk) 07:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Aw shucks... Serenesage - Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!--Phyo WP (message) 11:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

Thanks for letting me know the reason, SoWhy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries. If the article survives AFD (which looks likely), you can consider redirecting there per

WP:ATD as well. Regards SoWhy

13:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again, SoWhy. Will check back on the AfD. To be honest, I missed the link to the actual movement in the body of the article. I was so confused as to how an individual can have "members" (see infobox)… guess I took my eye off the ball. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey there. There’s an AfD on Anthony Padilla that could use your participation, as you were involved in the article's redirect. Thanks. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Padilla Sekyaw (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

The blog is also used as source List of Warner Bros. cartoons with Blue Ribbon reissues page confirming dates of re-release. Best :) Yay Dad (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Blogs are not reliable sources. Sorry. Please read

WP:RS. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

01:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Seymour Mamedov, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

There's a loose standard that 2600 games with name conflicts use the "(Atari 2600)" suffix:

Hi Dgpop - What you did is called a cut and paste move, which isn't allowed on WP, since it loses the history of the pages. What you need to do is ask for the redirect to be deleted using H7 speedy deletion. In the reason, simply state for a page move to follow naming conventions. Once the redirect is deleted, then "move" the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

I learned something new today--thank you! Dgpop (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Novosibirsk Capacitor Plant, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Insertcleverphrasehere has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

If you were not aware, PRODed and CSD tagged articles should not be marked as reviewed, per recent consensus here. Cheers,

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

—

Hi Insertcleverphrasehere - I did not mark it reviewed, simply tagged it for deletion. If you look at the edit summary as well as the logs, you'll notice that the prod was done simultaneously with the "reviewed". I think I was one of the first editors to agree with the proposal to only mark AfD's. We need to change the curation script. It apparently still automatically marks those pages reviewed if a page reviewer tags them for deletion. I haven't really paid attention to articles I prod (or CSD for that matter) to see if they are marked for review. In the future, I'll check to make sure I unmark them. However, another auto thing with the curation tool, is that it marks those articles to be put on my watchlist. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

click me!)

01:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Insertcleverphrasehere - Just had the first Speedy in a while Joseph Carrillo, and yup, it automatically marked it as reviewed. Would never have looked if you hadn't pointed it out. Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Palaichori Oreinis, which I tried to deal with in September, has reappeared as a content fork copied and pasted from Palaichori. I notice that you're currently in discussion with the same editor on another matter. Any suggestions please? Certes (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

That's a sticky one, Certes - That editor seems to not want to engage in discussions. I'm going to restore the redirect, with a note regarding BRD and disruptive editing. I know there's a policy regarding dupe articles, but I don't have a link for it... any ideas where it is? (by the way, very nice work you do here on WP... can't think of an interaction where I've disagreed with you). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

This editor's been around for almost 10 years. They should know better. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for stepping in. My instinct was to do something similar but, as I'd done that before and effectively been reverted, I wanted a second opinion.

WP:REDUNDANTFORK

may be the nearest we have to a relevant policy.

I've also admired your quietly competent editing and had to hold myself back from shouting at the admins when you were being unjustly roasted for a few minor disambiguation errors a few months ago. Certes (talk) 11:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries,

WP:A10, which is the speedy deletion criteria dealing with duplicate articles.Onel5969 ^{TT me}

12:08, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

There's a case for A10. (It is technically a "recently created article", although the page has been around for a while.) On the other hand, CSD are about getting rid of a page altogether, but I think we want to speedily replace this article by a redirect, which we can do without needing the admin's mop. Certes (talk) 12:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

(

No worries Sheldybett I've made many good faith nominations at AfD which the end result was "keep". But you're a relatively new editor. Don't be afraid to ask other editors for advice. I began editing in earnest in late 2013 (even though I opened the account in 2009), don't know when I nominated my first AfD. You might want to wait a bit. Participate in other AfD's, and watch how other editors make their arguments.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Why on earth are you repeatedly vandalising Wikipedia:Short description? You're an established editor and you know very well that it's not a "1980s English post-punk ensemble". One more and I'll take it to ANI. --RexxS (talk) 02:28, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi

The Folk Devils. Must have accidently clicked on the line above the "Missing article description (Add)", and then added it. But in checking that option out, it leads you to the template, which I made no changes to. So I must have clicked on the "article description", and added it there. Didn't realize the error until your very civil reply and use of the term "vandalism". My apologies and thanks for your civility. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

02:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome, but it wouldn't have turned out that way if you hadn't edit-warred your mistake back in again as soon as I fixed it. [1], [2]. Do you normally just re-revert any reversion without bothering to check, or did you accidentally click on the line above for a second time? Put yourself in my place and see how much AGF that generates. --RexxS (talk) 13:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

No, I still had the original article page up and couldn't understand why you would revert a short description. But your use of terms like vandalism, and "edit warring" for a single revert, show your lack of AGF. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Alan H. Goldman, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

scope_creep^Talk 14:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Did you delete the page I made for my father Ronald R. Schoenberg? Why? Can you restore it so I can work on it some more?

Randols (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I had created this page out of Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala because this temple had huge important events in the history and expanding the main article with all this century wise will make main article unreadable. I need time to add more content with citations. At the same time the history section of main article also needs to be made more precise. I opened a discussion on this on article's talk page. You can share your comments aggi007(talk) 13:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

To increase the adrenaline shot coming from this deserved reviewer big cup that your wikiskills have prompted. Thanks for reviewing so many articles! 1l2l3k (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks 1l2l3k - just trying to help out where I can. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

How to improve. Pl advise.--RajeshUnuppally 12:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi RajeshUnuppally - Well right away, you need a source for the history section. Other than that, just look for more sources and more in-depth information from reliable, independent sources. Other than that, it's nicely structured, pertinent photos. Nice job.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks and noted.--RajeshUnuppally 09:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello senior user, Sorry to distrub you, This actress has appeared in leading role in two projects i.e Teri Meri Kahani (TV series) and Beti (TV series) which is currently airing. Passes actor notability thats why i revert article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.8.237.3 (talk) 13:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

You're right, my bad. Missed the earlier series.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @Onel5969, I just recived notifications about copyright violatations. Is there any way to solve the problem without deleting articles? I am asking it since my last attempt to remove "important information" from flagged article was reverted. Thanks in advance. Georgiano (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Georgiano - absolutely. Re-word the article in your own words, then leave a message on the talk page letting an admin know that the copyvio problem has been addressed, and only a RevDel is needed. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, I just removed copyvio content. Could you review it again? Georgiano (talk) 17:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

		Happy Christmas!
		Hello Onel5969, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?" My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 07:55, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

So MarnetteD - Thank you so much for your kind words, your page stalking, your support, and all your contributions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Wow! Well done!
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past 12 months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
Thoroughly deserve it, good friend. I feel proud to know you. Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 17:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

And I am just of proud of you Gareth Griffith-Jones-after all, you were my mentor here back in 2013-2014.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

You are my most successful protégé by a long mile [3]. Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 11:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations you deserve this and also an opportunity for me to say thanks for going the extra mile with me when I was new here. CV9933 (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

I realise I am only one out of many indebted to you for reviews, but I would like to say thanks for your speedy review of my page Gibson Country Western (guitar model). It is appreciated! Cheers - Tony Rees in Australia Tony 1212 (talk) 23:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries Tony 1212, keep up the good work.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Shouldn't the history of Jim Ward (quarterback) prior to the un-redirecting on November 11 be at Jim Ward? I've noticed this IP doing this with many other old re-directs. This person for whatever reason instead of making an account and creating the article has decided to just create over a bunch of old re-directs. Should these histories be fixed?-- Yankees10 19:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Another example being Dave Martin (linebacker).-- Yankees10 19:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Actually it looks like you've been also fixing these [4]-- Yankees10 20:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Yankees10 - The history should follow the article, not the dab page. So when a dab page (or redirect) is created to the actual article, the history should be on the article. All of these seem to be okay. Hope that makes sense.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Ok. Just seems kind of odd to have some of these histories in there.-- Yankees10 21:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Onel5969, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, talk ) 09:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank you so much Treker - Always a pleasure interacting with you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

The PROD for Termokiss which you endorsed was declined, please feel free to comment at the AfD. Polyamorph (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Can you please move

I acknowledge I've not given you much time to respond, but I've submitted a technical request to have the page moved over my accidentally created stub. I've added some additional sources to the page and talk page. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:46, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Onel5969, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 14:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much Davey2010 - Always been an admirer of your work. Thanks for all you do.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome, Haha thanks but I don't really do much , Thanks anyway, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Christmas / Happy New Year} 14:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Thank you so much CAPTAIN RAJU! Right back at you. Always a pleasure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your great contributions Onel. My very best wishes for this holiday season. May your heart and the heart of those around you be filled with happiness during this special time. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
	Hope you enjoy the Christmas eve with the ones you love and step into the new year with lots of happiness and good health. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! GSS (talk

Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas ! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, SuperClash IV, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 20:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar

This is Ronald J. Allen. You sent me the following message. "OK, it's now in your Sandbox User:Ronald J. Allen/sandbox. What you have written is completely unsuitable for Wikipedia. For an article about a person, what is needed is content based on citations written about that person, by other people. A selected bibliography of work published by the person can be listed as part of the article, but none of that is usable to reference what the person thinks or says or does. Right now, everything following "A church theology" rests on what Williamson himself has written. David notMD (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)." I appreciate the attention you gave to this project, and especially its timeliness. While your message is highly disappointing, it does let me know where I stand with respect to this article. Unfortunately, I am not currently in a position to restart the research for this article using only secondary sources. Please know I appreciate the time you have given. I do have a general suggestion for Wikipedia. I cannot find a SIMPLE guide to how to develop an article, steps 1 . . . 2 . . . . 3 . . . . spelled out in straightforward, accessible, non-technical English. I think that would be very helpful. Best wishes in the new year. Ronald J. Allen (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry you got discouraged, Ronald J. Allen. Will pass along your suggestion to the ptb's. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

I didn't mean anything copyright infringement. The Template just leads to the respective Riders' shows and specials, not to the Characters themselves. If it'll be easier why not just delete the showa riders template? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.140.2 (talk) 15:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

No clue what you're talkin about.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

I meant that the 11 Riders are notable and they had their own pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.140.2 (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Amateur teams of Amateur league, which there is team history, have team wiki articles. Amateur teams of Amateur league don't team history in public news. they haven't wiki articles. You may not all teams in Amateur league haven't any articles Aquaelfin (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Have no clue what you're talking about, your post doesn't make sense.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Why

WP:FOOTYN defination teams which has wiki articles to must play in national level of the league structure. It prevents to create teams don't join Thailand Amateur League and more. Teams in Thailand Amateur League which have wiki articles must appeared team history in National public news. Aquaelfin (talk

) 18:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Then make a proposal at the footy project page to change their already incredible lax notability standards. I'm guessing English is not your first language, but it is very difficult to understand what you are attempting to say.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Onel5969. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.

JC7V (talk

Hi

WP:GNG, then I'd nominate it. If you've done you're before properly, then you shouldn't worry. Although even with that, sometimes articles do get kept. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

19:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Level C - because they don't exist.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969 - thanks for reviewing all my recent stuff. Perhaps you might consider nominating me at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled? I did recently put myself forward but was unfortunate to happen upon a jobsworth. I don't suppose it makes too much difference, but as you can see I have created loads more than 25 articles and am familiar with all the policies. It might save the likes of your good self some time going forward. Kind regards, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Bring back Daz Sampson - while I haven't had an issue with the articles you've created, the same issue which that admin brought up still exists. I don't necessarily agree with your assessment of their request of you. The issue they expressed still exists. Now, I don't necessarily agree with them asking the question and then only giving you slightly over 2 days to respond, especially since you only had 2 edits during that timeframe, so you weren't very active. But they declined your request due to your lack of response, which I can definitely see. Over at NPP, we've just had an editor of long-standing stripped of their autoconfirmed rights due to a seeming lack of understanding of some basic concepts regarding the importance of footnotes. You still have less than 80 page creations, and they are still all involving soccer players/soccer stuff. Bottom line is that I've nominated anyone for autopatroller status. While you specialize in soccer stuff, it might do you well to do a few articles in other areas, just to show you have a broader depth of knowledge regarding WP rules.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Onel5969, I now see that the article for one Frank Adonis has previously been deleted. I apologize for undoing your edit in my ignorance. However, I was wondering if there was the possibility of reopening the discussion for keep vs. delete, if I can find additional information to meet Wikipedia's expectations. Thanks! -Jmanlucas —Preceding undated comment added 06:50, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi

WP:GNG. This means finding at least 3 in-depth references to him in independent, reliable sources. I have a pretty broad acceptance of film-related articles, and when I did my search back during the AfD, I simply couldn't find enough to warrant a keep !vote. If you can find that type of sourcing, that would be the way to go. If you do, recreate the article, and leave a message on the talk page, detailing the new, in-depth sourcing. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

21:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm AmericanAir88. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tyrone Anthony, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

AmericanAir88^(talk) 19:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Why the reversion on Oren Cass? Any author of a book discussed in the NYT seems notable enough (to me). Yfever (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Then I might suggest you take a look at

WP:NAUTHOR.Onel5969 ^{TT me}

21:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Yfever (talk) 00:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

FWIW, there's a 1RR ruling for post-1932 US political articles. GoodDay (talk) 21:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

And if this were a political article, that would have some meaning. And if it had meaning, your revert of my revert would be in violation of it. Do you have a source for that or not?Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Source for what? Check over at Jon Kyl & related articles. GoodDay (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Source for your assertion. Nothing at Kyl's article suggests that his resignation is effective before the end of day. All news reports have it at end of day, not at some arbitrary hour during the day. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Other articles have him as no longer being a US senator. Doesn't matter, as it's only a matter of hours. By tomorrow, he'll be deleted from the Arizona article, anyways. GoodDay (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)