User talk:Oraklebat

Hello, Oraklebat, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 04:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

First, you cannot copy information from other pages, merge it to another and call that notable. That's why the Arrowverse page DOES NOT exist, because it's just a merging of content. We don't create pages and hope that people make them notable afterward. Should other pages exist, probably not, but I'm not working those pages. It is generally expected that most season pages won't even be created until after a fourth season because of space, and should only be created sooner when they are notable. Right now, you are simply stealing information from the main page and character page and calling it unique. It's not.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The soundtrack information? You mean the stuff on the main page? Inserting a track list doesn't make it notable or "new" information. Look at the difference between

Smallville (season 1). The latter has unique information that isn't found on the main page and has information making it notable.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

There's also no source for that music track information, and I feel like it was just taken from IMDb.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you were bold in your edits, but they were reverted. If you disagree so wholeheartedly, then start a discussion at the LoE page.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't expanded anything though. Unless you consider pulling information from other Wiki pages "expanding" (I call it duplication) and adding an unsourced track list of music (which is not really notable by itself) that would likely get removed if it's simply taken from IMDb it's just from you watching, that's called

original research.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to work on them at

Draft:Arrow (season 1), that's fine. You list "expand" templates when you have a page that is already notable, but not large or extensive. Season one of Arrow (and season two) haven't shown to be notable. All of the information on them is information that Is on the main page or the LoE page. You cannot strip the main page and say that makes the season's notable.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Plot information isn't "new". It's plot and doesn't dictate notability. What again is new in music? You still have original research in your tracking of music, and the prose information above it all comes from the main page. The casting info on Amell is from the main page and Oliver's character page. The only "new" information I can read is about casting Diggle and the rest of the actors comes from GreenArrowTV which is a fansite and unreliable source. It's only usuable when it's a direct interview, which it isn't. Additionally, there is more original research in that section, as you have stuff regarding Mia Deardon which isn't sourced, the stuff about Diggle's name. You've added fan speculation into the page and surrounded it with sources like they verify it. Basic announcement of casting isn't noteworthy. I know you're heart is in the right place, but you cannot cut corners because you really want a page to exist in the mainspace.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bignole: very well, would you mind explaining to me then what kind of information (or quantity for that matter) would dictate notability. (And btw everything about music that is in the Arrow main page was written by me so I doubt it would constitute simply copying information. The main page has become too long, and it would be better for organizational purposes to move information to articles of the season to which it corresponds (for example in production))Oraklebat (talk) 20:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

File:Legends of Tomorrow Logo.png

A tag has been placed on

section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Hello, Oraklebat. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oraklebat. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oraklebat. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knightfall (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knightfall (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kleuske (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Knightfall (character) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § Knightfall (character) until a consensus is reached. Mika1h (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]