If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Cindamuse (
talk ) 04:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of Say hi! 00:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to
cite any
verifiable sources .
Please
for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Favonian (
talk ) 18:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
This is your last warning ; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice . — Malik Shabazz Talk /Stalk 18:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
]
Suggestion
Don't post things you made up here, try Idea Wiki, if you want to do that.
--Hailey 22:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk ) 12:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Nero the Hero (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced, no indication of notability per WP:HOAX
.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk ) 12:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Nanoboy: Hero on the Run has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable show from red-linked studios. Zero sources and zero coverage outside of Wikipedia and related mirrors. Possible hoax.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 14:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
Despite the laundry list of notifications and explanations as to how your edits are not compliant with Wikipedia policy, you continue on without improvement or communication with other editors. This cannot continue. I strongly urge you to seek a
competence to do so. If you continue to add unsourced information to articles, create inappropriate articles, refuse to acknowledge the concerns of other editors, and continue to edit in a disruptive fashion, it may result in a block of your account.
Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 14:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article
reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
reliable source, you may remove the
{{ prod blp }} tag.
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
Darkness Shines (
talk ) 12:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please do not remove
reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or
commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you.
Darkness Shines (
talk ) 17:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
You have been
blocked temporarily from editing for long term
disruptive editing . I gave you a clear warning that your continued creation of unsourced and inappropriate articles, coupled with your refusal to communicate with other editors or address concerns raised, will lead to a block of your account. Despite this you continue to edit in a disruptive fashion. I've blocked you for a week in order to prevent further disruption when you return. Your options are limited once the block expires - begin editing constructively (ideally with the assistance of a mentor), or continue as you have been and receive an indefinite block. The choice is entirely yours.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions . If you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text
{{unblock |reason=Your reason here ~~~~ }}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article Johnny Test: The Next Level has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced. Not encyclopedically factual because not yet released. Insufficient content (summary). Spam links (unreliable sources). See criteria at WP:RS
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk ) 12:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article
reliable source
that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
reliable source, you may remove the
{{ prod blp }} tag.
Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.
Pburka (
talk ) 21:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい ) 20:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]