User talk:Oyond

Thank you very much for the tip. Yep its going to take some time learning proper editing. Tbh this is a great oportunity for me to update my knowledge on certain things, and catch up on current trend waves. I noticed academics like taner akcams identerian outlook on Turkish war of independence back in 2010. If you look everything from that point of view you exclude material conditions of the era...such as partitioning of ottoman empire. Oyond (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Hey Paradise. If you have any other tip let me know. There is soo much to check. Btw is it me or wikipedia is actualy war zone. I started this after i realized turkish war of independence was perverted to suit political narritive. Now i am starting to realize there is ongoing turk kurd armenian edit fights here...Having Kurd/Kazak decent i dont realy have quarrel with anyone tbh... Oyond (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Funny thing is every page i go i keep seing same user names. Including yours. Oyond (talk) 07:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--V. E. (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I responded to it accordingly. Lets see how what they decide Oyond (talk) 01:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but your not willing to discuss it in the talk of that article. Please go there are create constructive comments/ criticism. I am going to let your warning stay here for couple of days then remove it.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. Once again ill let this stay here for couple of days untill admins can come to their own conclusions. Meanwhile could you respond to discussions in the article rather then attacking me with allegations. Oyond (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Kemalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oyond (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you for the notification. However I do not know if you review the topic but i invided both Buidhe and FDW777 to discuss it in the talk section of this articles. They revered(tag team revert) without providing substantial reason. I insisted on their full explanation for the reverts. So in my defense I was more then willing to discuss. However I cannot say the same for the other parties. I think wikipedia rules(and complains) may be used here for alternative purposes. Oyond (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see

WP:NOTTHEM. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.