User talk:PD Slessor

Hi PD Slessor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fahads1982 (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PD Slessor, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account for a 90 day period, at the end of which you may apply for permanent extension for the right. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am getting back to making articles, but would love to do NPP and help with the back log. Easier to review than create sometimes. May I request? @Chetsford PD Slessor (talk) 09:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but can you make the request at

WP:PERM? For NPP I have to add you to the distribution list (in addition to applying the permission to your account) and I can't do that from your Talk page. Chetsford (talk) 03:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Chetsford Done. I left a message on your talk page. PD Slessor (talk) 05:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for why barry took off my edits is simply hypocritical. He's allowing the "Megamind memes dominate the internet 12 years after release" and "Ahead of its time" sources on there (in which I literally am the one who put those 2 sources there in the first place.) But he's not allowing the objectively better one with more information on it. Nobody has said anything bad about the current edit I've made and nor do I see anything wrong with the edit itself. 2603:6000:B800:EB4:D508:179B:1BEF:736E (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to talk page, and consider making an account. The page in question has historically been the victim of vandalism and disruptive editing. If you are 100% confident in your edit, feel free to revert, but be prepared to takeit to ANI if your edit is undone again. PD Slessor (talk) 04:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thank you so very much for creating articles about Kenyan politicians; biographies of Africans are unfortunately underrepresented on WP. With that being said, I noticed that you have been using the source "Kenyan Life" for some of these biographies, sometimes to reference a controversy the subject was involved in. This site is not a

Thank you for the comment. My mother was heavily involved with an American NGO that worked in Kenya, and growing up always showed us photos and said we would go when we were a little bit older. She unfortunately passed, but had a heart for Kenya and did everything she could to raise awareness for it. I, have still not been to Kenya unfortunately, and did not realize that source wasn't reliable, but I will make sure to make a note of this. PD Slessor (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Amini (startup). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not the only good source; all (of them} are routine announcements of $4 million raised.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoraVoro, appreciate your feedback and understand the need for more comprehensive sources to establish notability of a topic. But I have moved back to mainspace for now, but welcome and encourage any assistance. This is not routine, and I would say this listing also demonstrates notability imho. PD Slessor (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amini (startup) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amini (startup) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, note that inline references must be added next to the text they support. I noticed that, at least in David Karithi and Kubai Iringo you added references that, as far as I can see, arenot related to the preceding text. MarioGom (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry for letting you down @Chetsford, I felt like the stakes were so high, and your compliments set a high bar. Amidst the pressure and desire to fulfill what seemed like "my purpose," I dastardly failed PD Slessor (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD Slessor, you didn't fail. You are learning and improving. I've been editing here for 10 years and I still have editors coming to my user talk page "correcting" me. Critique is part of working on a collaborative editing project. Some editors can't handle criticism and decide to quit. But if you read through the message and find elements you can learn from, and not take critiques about editing decision to be personal, then they can help you become a better editor. And that's the goal, that's why Chetsford took the time to comment here. And I doubt you can find an active content creator who hasn't had an article they created nominated for deletion consideration. It can hurt but, again, that's how you learn the ropes. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD Slessor (talk) 08:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amini (startup). Thanks! Star Mississippi 15:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Star Mississippi I have done what I said and was asked via consensus. Kate Kallot is now live and Amini (startup) is redirected to it. PD Slessor (talk) 00:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gaby Jallo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. GiantSnowman 12:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

• I don't understand? Im supposed to @Cray04 but why? Is it my ip? Hope this ALL gets resolved im leerilUser contributionsy holdin bsck tears,,,,

PD Slessor (talk) 08:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't understamd? Im supposed to ne Cray but why? Is it my ip? Hope this gets resolved im leerily holdin bsck tears

PD Slessor (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PD Slessor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Use of dynamic IP? My IP changes on my "home network" which is provided by a cellular based router. The area Im in gets awful wifi, so we use routers that work like a cellphone hotspot. and I also travel for work occasionally. What reason did I get blocked for? I didn't do anything wrong... PD Slessor (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your question was answered below; the request otherwise does not address why you were blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do I do to fix this? PD Slessor (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I do not respond to appeals via email. You are blocked because technical evidence suggests that you are (1) the same person as Cray04 and (2) deliberately trying to obfuscate that connection. The details are available for review by other checkusers. --Blablubbs (talk) 02:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kate Kallot. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and blocke auhtor, COI, notability issues. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Kallot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Kallot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 16:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]