User talk:Paradygmaty

Welcome!

Hi Paradygmaty! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

March 2025

Failure to listen to concerns about your editing - see the statement at your ANI discussion for details.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:42, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paradygmaty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I disagree with the block. I think I should be unblocked and have the opportunity to speak with someone who can explain what went wrong. On my part, I can promise that until permission is granted, I will not edit stadium-related articles and will step away from the naming issue. I will fully comply with any instructions if there are things I have done wrong in the past. Paradygmaty (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No chance of an unblock with this approach. Please read the statement below from Insanityclown1 and take it to heart. Yamla (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would suggest that you really take the time to read the entirety of the ANI thread and take onboard the feedback that was given there. In the words of Bushranger You have been given "good-faith guidance on how to proceed". Multiple times. Each time you say "just let me know" "I'm open to any suggestions" etc. in response to the suggestions. And below you say "Okay, you are right" to Liz - before continuing here exactly as you have been - with responses that are very blatantly either LLM-generated or indistinguishable from such. I'm guessing English is not your first language, and that's okay, but that puts the onus on you to really make sure you understand what other people are saying to you, which I thin is what led to the block for