User talk:Patch455

Hello and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a
  reliable sources
  .
• No
  abuse of multiple accounts
  .
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The

Your recent editing history at Airbus A330 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image would be fine without the unnecessary black and white filter. Patch455 (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patch455! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Manticore 12:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Manticore 12:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Airbus A330. BilCat (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing disruptively even if you believe you are right, it is entirely unconstructive. Wikipedia is a place where verifiability and reliable sources are paramount and I provided those. You have a history of edit warring and I implore you to change your ways. Best regards. Andro611 (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that you have ignored my plead I am compelled to report you for violating the Three revert rule Andro611 (talk) 10:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time I try to reason with you. Ad hominems and reverting my edits with no stated reason will get you nowhere. Do you want reliable sources to back up my edits? No problem: AFP ”southern Chinese city” [[1]], “special administrative region of China” [[2]], Reuters ”...China's freest city” [[3]], Guardian ”Hong Kong has been one of just two cities in China...” [[4]] All of these point to the fact that the Kwai Tsing Container Terminals, which are of course in Hong Kong, are in the country of China. If the field was asking for region or city then, yes, you would be right. But it's not. Andro611 (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andro611 (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of busiest container ports. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Manticore 10:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of busiest container ports. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I have noticed that you seem to approach Wikipedia as a

battleground, evidenced by your combative editing style (including edit warring), and use of personal attacks against other editors. This type of behaviour is inconsistent with the expectations of editors here. If you don't shape up soon, you may find yourself losing editing privileges permanently. — Manticore 01:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I see that you are continuing to engage in an edit war without responding to my message above. You can consider this a final warning to stop this behaviour before you are (again) reported for edit warring. — Manticore 20:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Patch455 reported by User:MartinezMD (Result: ). Thank you. MartinezMD (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Skene's gland. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Manticore 08:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Skene's gland for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit summary, you evidently do not understand

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Patch455 reported by User:MartinezMD (Result: ). Thank you. MartinezMD (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Skene's gland.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]