User talk:PatriciaSeitz
Welcome
|
September 2011
Please do not write an article about yourself. Creating an
Speedy deletion nomination of Patricia Elliott Seitz
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Contemporary artists
Please can you explain how you belong on this list... a list of artists who create contemporary art, i.e. those whose peak of activity can be situated somewhere between the 1970s (the advent of postmodernism) and the present day. Artists on this list meet the following criteria:
- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by his/her peers or successors.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
- The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries.
RegardsTheroadislong (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Removal of Maintenance Templates
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Nomination of Patricia Elliott Seitz for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/42px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia Elliott Seitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Elliott Seitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Patricia Elliott Seitz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. OlYellerTalktome 20:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
- Hi Patricia. I'd be more than happy to help you with the article. I'm sorry if the templates above aren't clear and/or are intimidating. I keep an eye on a large number of articles and it would be impossible to keep up without the templates.
- As for the article, the first issue would be the maintenance templates. Those are placed so that other editors, who deal with the problems listed, know to come to this article to help improve it. Until they are addressed or until there's a conversation that concludes that the templates don't apply, they must stay. Removing them otherwise will eventually result in a block.
- One major and pressing issue at this point is notability. "Notability" as defined by Wikipedia reliable sources(major news organizations, not blogs, Facebook, MySpace, etc.).
- So right now, that needs to be addressed or the article will be deleted. After that, we can address the other issue that the improvement templates point out. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here, on the talk page of the article, or on my talk page. OlYellerTalktome 14:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Here to help
Let me know if I can help. Just click "talk" beside my name. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2011 (UTC)