User talk:Piruty Pipaty

Hello, Piruty Pipaty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vijay Kartik Kannan did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thank you so much for fixing my error in the page of Vijay Kartik Kannan.

By Piruty Pipaty (talk) 13:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When moving pages, you should explain why you will move such pages. I've seen this today; you moved both

Piruty Pipaty, I just wanted to chime in and say it's okay to move pages if you have a valid reason and you're fairly certain nobody will object, however while you are new, seeking input or consensus first is always a good choice (before the move, ideally) If you aren't sure, you're free to ask at

WP:TEAHOUSE first. Thanks for your contributions! ASUKITE 18:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Ïvana. I noticed that you recently removed content from Om Shanti Om without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ïvana (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry for removing it without the proper explanation.

Thnak you so much for reminding it.

By Piruty Pipaty (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Everest International School, Japan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much !

Due to your act of kindness, I could realize my mistake. I have now added more sources and is about to publish it for reviews.

By Piruty Pipaty (talk) 08:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Samoht27 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Could possibly be notable, definitely needs a rewrite.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everest International School, Japan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Piruty Pipaty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Samoht27 (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your tags that say "will be edited soon" at Senthil filmography and Arbaaz Khan filmography. These are not necessary and you can always add the Overview section at your own leisure. Alternatively, if the article is not ready or sourced, it could have stayed as a draft for longer. DareshMohan (talk) 07:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me.

Actually, I am going to edit the Overview of either one of them today and another tomorrow. I am sorry for confusion.

By Piruty Pipaty (talk) 07:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please make use of the edit summary, especially while making edits like this. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reminder! Piruty Pipaty (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

requesting change of kalki box office to 700 crore as users are changing it without any reason, the box office has passed 700 crore 2409:40F3:101A:4292:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 13:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - you have not provided any WP:reliable sources to support your claim - Arjayay (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Piruty Pipaty, thank you for creating

I noticed you copied content from several articles in your creations. Please attribute all of those as soon as possible. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reminder! Piruty Pipaty (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding an "overview" section to filmography pages. You have been reverted in multiple articles, so please stop re-adding them. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move pages without consensus like you did here [1]. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Taglines. DareshMohan (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Piruty Pipaty (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Piruty Pipaty. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Piruty Pipaty (talk) 00:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Merz cabinet instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merz cabinet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]