User talk:PokkiriPandian

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.

In this edit you added that Sethupathi became a "Box Office Hit" (italics yours). This is meaningless subjective fluff and constitutes

In this edit you wrote "The film opened well and became a Box Office success." But the reference you submitted says nothing about "success".

In this edit you changed "it was above average at box office" to "it was a moderate success at the box office", but the existing reference says nothing to support either perspective, which suggests that you're just editorializing.

In this edit you say "The film released on 4 March 2016 to positive reviews". This is a broad statement that describes the entirety of critical response, and is only supported by a single cherrypicked review (which, by the way, gives the film a lukewarm 3/5 stars, making it an exceptionally poor choice if you're trying to say the film received positive reviews). If I were to find two negative reviews and add them as references, would I be able to change the summary to "mostly negative reviews". No, because we shouldn't be summarizing critical response without attributing that summary to a reliable source. That is: a reliable published source has to say "the film received mostly positive reviews". We are not critical response aggregators.

Wikipedia is not a forum for us to express our opinions. It is an objective encyclopedia. Content must be properly sourced, must be written

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aalavandhan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. NO NEED TO SUPRESS YOUR OWN VIEWS. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BLOG OK! SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 11:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Proposed deletion of Battlefield Enforcement

The article Battlefield Enforcement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable upcoming film, does not meet

WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 17:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kattarpanthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, no secondary independent coverage, does not meet

WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 17:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kattarpanthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kattarpanthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 00:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battlefield Enforcement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield Enforcement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 01:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, PokkiriPandian. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vishwavijay Movie Poster.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vishwavijay Movie Poster.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]