User talk:Politicalwizard2000

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 18:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are there, i just have to add them. It will be hard not having a computer to do it on due to me being on mobile Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. You can always ping me if you want help with the draft or review it. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 18:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Strokin'|cv=no|reason=reason|details=

|reason2=|details2=|comment=|sig=yes}}

Hello, Politicalwizard2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strokin', which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Template:2024CARep, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accidently put the wrong person. But I'm curious if write in votes count, thats why I tried to add them Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need a source for the write-ins. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I kindly ask that you respect the

It's really strange that you are insistent on removing Kennedy. Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 15:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I am so insistent on removing him, why did I add him to the California and Michigan infoboxes? Prcc27 (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LunaEclipse. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Million Dollar Baby (Tommy Richman song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Please ignore this warning, I went after the wrong person. 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no worries lmao, take care Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 00:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

bro its literally synth-funk, people love to not label synth-funk correctly Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then create your own magazine of music journalism and hire those you consider professionals. Or rather, wait from heaven for a reliable review that supports you (sorry for the sarcasm, but, as Laje said, "esto es demasiado"; Wikipedia is not a space in which you put information according to what you think, but rather according to what professional media that are RELIABLE say). Santi (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

don't need to be an asshole lmao Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]