User talk:Procrastineur49
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
CS1 error on Luxembourg
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Luxembourg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of the first openly LGBT holders of political offices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Luxembourg
Hi. Could you please explain what you are doing to articles re Luxembourgers/Luxembourgian/Luxembourgish? Thanks. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for making so many of them in a short span without consultation, perhaps I got overzealous. "Luxembourgian" seems to be a very rare form, and as a lifelong Luxembourger I've never heard it used orally. Look around on official websites like gouvernement.lu or luxembourg.public.lu and you find virtually no instance of it. lod.lu, the main online source for Luxembourgish words and their translations, cannot find it. "Luxembourgish" is a much more widely used variant that is consistant with e.g French "Luxembourgeois" (note how "Luxembourgien", which would logically be the cognate of "Luxembourgian", is entirely inexistent) and German "Luxemburgisch", while "Luxembourgian", and this is just my personal assumption, seems to be used by non-Luxembourgish contributors who, due to Luxembourg's relative obscurity, are unsure of its demonym. I would go as far as saying it is an incorrect form. Procrastineur49 (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)