User talk:PsichoPuzo
Welcome!
Hello, PsichoPuzo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, PsichoPuzo. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Message regarding the Ukrainian VDV
You and I are obviously at a disagreement on the
Copying licensed material requires proper attribution
It appears that you have added material to the article Nil Khasevych using content translated from the Ukrainian wiki. While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original author(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed web pages, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied licensed material before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, PsichoPuzo. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dnipro (anti-air missile)
Hello PsichoPuzo,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Hello, 2S22 Bohdana has been tagged as unreferenced. Can you remember what your sources were? If they are the items listed in 'External links', can you re-name it 'Sources' or 'References' to make that clear? (External links just means suggestions for further reading). Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of LimpidArmor
Hello PsichoPuzo,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged LimpidArmor for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
SamHolt6 (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of LimpidArmor
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- While I saw your comment on the talk page, I'm afraid I had to delete the article anyway. The language was just too promotional, and there were concerns that it had been copied from a web source, too. Please read ]
Hungarian irredentism
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.(KIENGIR (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC))
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, PsichoPuzo. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Solar power in Belarus
Thanks for creating Solar power in Belarus.
A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains(talk) 16:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Block
El_C 19:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
PsichoPuzo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Violated blocking rule terms. "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language." with provided evidences on noticeboard [1]--PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This doesn't look like vandalism to me, let alone obvious vandalism — edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism
. It looks like a content dispute. stwalkerster (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's not obvious to me. If it is, indeed, so outside of the mainstream, another editor can revert them. You should not be violating 3RR to do so — the edits just do not constitute obvious vandalism. El_C 19:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Unblock
Because I mistakenly unblocked the other user, I am unblocking you, too. You are just lucky I made a mistake with them, and so I am unblocking you to be even-handed. You may edit the article talk page, but please do not edit the article itself, in any way for 60 hours. El_C 21:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Geothermal power in Ukraine) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Geothermal power in Ukraine.
Please be wary of simply copying material from other sources. Please read
WP:COPYVIO.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 00:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
New message from Iryna Harpy
Please don't keep reverting without
A Barnstar for you
The Redirect Barnstar | ||
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! ibicdlcod (talk) 12:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Knights of the Cross of Merit
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:Knights of the Cross of Merit has been nominated for listification
Category:Knights of the Cross of Merit has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Figures of UPA has been nominated for upmerging
Category:Figures of UPA has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
January 2022
- Please do not delete sources for the provided information.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320#defence-blog.com and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344#armyrecognition.com, they are not reliable references. They are self-published garbage. FDW777 (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is very loud statement. All sources are self-published in that interpretation. Nevertheless, they provide meaningful information and there is other sources available in search with same information. But removing sources and afterwards information they reference for is pure vandalism.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Removing content supported by deprecated and/or unreliable sources is not vandalism. Edit warring to restore disputed content supported only by unreliable sources will lead to a block.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)]
- I see you've been blocked for edit warring before and tried to pass it off as reverting vandalism in your unsuccessful appeal, so you cannot claim to be unaware of what does and does not constitute vandalism on this project.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Removing content supported by deprecated and/or
- It is very loud statement. All sources are self-published in that interpretation. Nevertheless, they provide meaningful information and there is other sources available in search with same information. But removing sources and afterwards information they reference for is pure vandalism.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320#defence-blog.com and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344#armyrecognition.com, they are not reliable references. They are self-published garbage. FDW777 (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FDW777 (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)- @Ponyo: you will be reported for exciding blocking terms.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 23:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Feel free to report me once your block expires. You seem to have as thorough a grasp on our blocking policies as you do on Wikipedia's reliable sourcing criteria and what does and does not constitute vandalism. In the meantime, the instructions for posting an appeal can be found in my block message. No need to ping me again as admins don't review their own blocks.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 22:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Transition of church communities to OCU moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Nomination of Chronology of Ukrainian language suppression for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chronology of Ukrainian language suppression, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Ukrainian language suppression until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)- @ToBeFree: are you sane?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- The reason I've chosen an indefinite block is your response to the previous warnings and blocks, so thanks for the confirmation. Your behavior is currently incompatible with a collaborative project, as demonstrated at Separate Presidential Brigade and the messages visible above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: So you reasoning indefinete block with reverting sourced information removal and overall article improvement with additional disambig pages creation and additional description with translations from other languages in article originaly created by me? Am I right?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- I honestly didn't look much at the content of your edits other than that they have been repeatedly identical against another user's good-faith concerns. If I understand the last part of your question correctly, you should have a look at WP:OWN. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- I honestly didn't look much at the content of your edits other than that they have been repeatedly identical against another user's good-faith concerns. If I understand the last part of your question correctly, you should have a look at
- @ToBeFree: So you reasoning indefinete block with reverting sourced information removal and overall article improvement with additional disambig pages creation and additional description with translations from other languages in article originaly created by me? Am I right?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- The reason I've chosen an indefinite block is your response to the previous warnings and blocks, so thanks for the confirmation. Your behavior is currently incompatible with a collaborative project, as demonstrated at Separate Presidential Brigade and the messages visible above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: Is it ok with you that revision 1135428751 and revision 1135433293 is a bit false reporting?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't care, really. I evaluate behavior, not content, in such disputes. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @WP:RV. How do you evaluating such behavior?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- @ToBeFree: is it good behavior revision 1135437644 not described in false reporting? In case where language translation is changed to wrong spelling?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- The block is about your behavior, not others'.
- The first helpful step of WP:UNRESPONSIVE). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- @WP:UNRESPONSIVE).--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- [2]: "No difference". [3]: "No difference". Again and again. Preventing further disruption is a valid block reason (WP:BLOCKP describes the situation quite accurately). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- @ToBeFree: Is it revision 1135426551 same contribution again and again wich was described as without showing any interest in collaboration?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't understand your question, and I think you're missing the point. You said you have not made the same contribution again and again, I have proven the opposite by linking to three byte-to-byte identical revisions you have published during the edit war, each time in response to another user's removal of statements you subsequently re-inserted. If you believe that this isn't sufficient to demonstrate a preventative need for a block, you can ask for a second opinion using the instructions in the block notice above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Is it revision 1135426551 same contribution again and again wich was described as without showing any interest in collaboration?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- [2]: "No difference". [3]: "No difference". Again and again. Preventing further disruption is a valid block reason (
- @
- @ToBeFree: is it good behavior revision 1135437644 not described in false reporting? In case where language translation is changed to wrong spelling?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @
PsichoPuzo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
It's clear yoiu still do not understand why you were blocked, and are arguing your point here in your unblock statement. Also, I believe there is a
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@
- @PsichoPuzo: It is not a requirement of editors of the English Wikipedia to be able to understand either Ukranian or Russian, nor even to inherently distinguish the two. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Iazyges: but it is pretty obvious that grammatically senseless wording from other languages in article describing objects from that origin is a bit strange.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, PsichoPuzo
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Firefangledfeathers, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Firefangledfeathers}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 08:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Ukrainian resistance movement has been nominated for merging
Category:Ukrainian resistance movement has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GCarty (talk) 21:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)