User talk:Puppetfunny

Okay. If i mess up one more time i would like to be blocked.

Hello, Puppet,

If you really would like to be blocked, you may contact one of the many administrators available via Talkpage. But rather than using Help templates, which will usually be responded to by non-admins, please contact an administrator. However, would you mind sharing why you would like to be blocked? Cheers, Kevin12xd (contribs) 15:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

<== Speedy deletion nomination of Recto Queso ==>

Hello Puppetfunny,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Recto Queso for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

A tag has been placed on Andre Neverson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is an "
  section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked
  from editing Wikipedia.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Syrthiss (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, the subject is a suspect and is

WP:BLP1E at most only known for one event, assuming they are convicted. That's pretty much beyond our limit for inclusion, however good the source, in my opinion. Regards, Syrthiss (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Noah Cyrus, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Ryan Vandegrift is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Ryan Vandegrift until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Syrthiss (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make userpages for other users, especially non-existent users like the one you moved your userpage to yesterday. Thanks. Syrthiss (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to rename your account, you can do so by filing a request at

WP:CHU. However, as Syrthiss says, please don't try to rename your account by moving your userpage; it just doesn't work like that. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cameron B. Stewart for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brent Thompson (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per

WP:NACTOR

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 01:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Thompson (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Thompson (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 02:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article The King and the Slave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources beyond user-editable Wikia/IMDB, no context, appears to be something made up in school one day.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 03:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jules Stewart has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]