User talk:Pvisi111

Speedy deletion of "IGOBanking.com"

A page you created, IGOBanking.com, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article

.

Thanks.

talk) 14:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Notability of IGOBanking.com

guide to writing your first article

.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pvisi111 (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of IGoBanking.com

Wikipedia:Business' FAQ

for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Igobanking

Wikipedia:Business' FAQ

for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 20:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nominator that this article does qualify under

criteria G11 as advertising. I am not sure whether it is truly notable; individual investment products, unless they are strikingly innovative, would not normally be considered worth an article. The links you include are not articles about this product itself, but just include it in a long list of possible investments. If there were multiple independent articles on this as a single subject, that might establish notability. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Aude (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deli nk (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Karen Cockburn. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dabbler (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SF Video

Wikipedia:Business' FAQ

for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

(Review) 20:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]



Image copyright problem with Image:Sfvideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading 
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recovery Connection

the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Recovery Connection and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 19:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the notability guidelines at 
reliable sources as to the notability of the subject of your article. Corvus cornix_talk 19:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

External links

Please read spamming. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Eleanor Rigby and The Beatles

Hello. I have reverted your recent changes to 
cite your sources, too! Stephenb (Talk) 19:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Kemp Technologies

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
. Thank you.
The content you added was not encyclopaedic and was not referenced. ^Talk 22:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Billboard external links

Hello, please do not add external links to Mentality 20:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]



Image permission problem with Image:LH - Wiki.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:LH - Wiki.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here
.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at 
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Image permission problem with Image:N9negroup.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:N9negroup.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here
.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at 
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supermodel article

I replied on my talk page. 
talk) 21:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prime Visibility

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations . If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Prime Visibility A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prime Visibility, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: Reads like an advert. Not sure it passes wp:ORG All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bonewah (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cameta Camera

Article Wizard
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
talk) 21:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
] September 2009 talk) 21:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ] Articles for deletion nomination of The Tax Club I have nominated The Tax Club, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tax Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] Speedy deletion nomination of Prime Visibility Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marokwitz (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Speedy deletion nomination of GlycoCarn Article Wizard. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xtzou (Talk) 13:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of FindingDulcinea for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FindingDulcinea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FindingDulcinea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jayron32 20:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] File:N9ne steakhouse.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, T/C) 22:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply ] August 2011 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 14:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Infosurv for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infosurv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infosurv until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EyeSerene^talk 14:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of KEMP Technologies for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KEMP Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted . The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEMP Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EyeSerene^talk 14:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pvisi111&oldid=1140290603"