User talk:Quantanew
Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!
Hello, Quantanew, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 02:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Boldness
That's fine, I suppose. I opened a discussion on the talk page earlier; feel free to post when you have the time. NW (Talk) 17:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Changes to OrbitboxPlanet templates
Hi, I reverted out your addition of a radius column to the OrbitboxPlanet templates. This is a major layout change that affects many articles, and at present the majority of known exoplanets do not have this information. It is probably worth bringing this up at
]White–Juday warp-field interferometer
Thank you for the response and I apologize if my comments on the article talk page came off like I am shooting the messenger. I too love articles on quantum mechanics and space travel and would love to see a break-through in space travel. I am, however, skeptical of break-through announcements (even from NASA). You used the wording of the secondary online news sources for the article that, in turn, used the press releases from the research group. The news sources should have known better than to repeat the fantastic claims of the group without carefully looking into them. I am tempted to put the article up for deletion however it is perhaps better to leave it to counter the fantastic (and unsupported) claims being made for this device. Aldebaran66 (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Dear Quantanew, can you give me a reference, where did you take tis picture from?
-
Eagleworks Warp-Field Interferometer CCD Camera Test Results 04-04-2015 - EmDrive
I will be very pleased. Thanks a lot. Niihelium (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Insert-signature.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Button_sig.png)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HARPS-N, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First light (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
I hope you find my work on and around your work in this article OK. Open to discussion; or change (back) as you wish; but I think we were on the same track. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Help for Translation
Can you translate this English wiki article "
Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TRAPPIST-1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentricity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Quantanew - Nearly two weeks ago, you asked me to discuss an edit to Florence Griffith Joyner on that talk page rather than removing it from the entry. Though I find the edit to be unencyclopedic and virtually indefensible, I complied with your request, but the talk page section has sat undiscussed for all of this time. Are you planning to comment? I see that someone has edited the poor grammar, but I really don't feel like the testosterone information should be there at all without a source connecting it to the subject.
As an additional heads up, I believe you mischaracterized the revert process when you commented in your edit summary "Don't revert before talk". Though there are exceptions, the usual process is known as
A page you started (Kepler-20g) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating
Wikipedia editor Neonorange just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Well formatted; how about crediting the discovery and adding the method. :Neonorange
To reply, leave a comment on Neonorange's talk page.
Learn more about
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Quantanew. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Quantanew. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Harold G. White
Hi, the reason why I removed your recent edits is that the claim of FTL travel being possible is a pretty huge one, and requires lots of realiable sources to back it up. The Washington post article was not related (it was speculation, and published before the experiments were performed). The other two are non-peer reviewed presentations. Let's wait for the peer review. Smite-Meister (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Colossus Telescope for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colossus Telescope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChiZeroOne (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Quantanew. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Edit warring at Computer shogi
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Computer shogi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Quantanew. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)