User talk:Qwert uyi

Regarding your edits to Print Camp:

Your recent edit to

edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Welcome!

Hello, Qwert uyi, and

welcome

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

M. Salleh 10:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Notability of Print Camp

The article

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources

.

Please

M. Salleh 10:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Bad Faith nominations

Nominating several articles for deletion because the article you created is considered poor form and can be seen as vandalism if it continues. Please read

Crossmr 05:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Off to a bad start

Don't get stressed, Wikipedia's rule structure is incredibly complex but in the end it boils down to a few fundamental things:

everything in Wikipedia must be stated from a
neutral point of view
everything in Wikipedia must be
attributable to reliable sources
Wikipedia is
not just a directory

What that means is that you need to show that your article is not just a directory entry, but that the subject as some encyclopaedic merit, as established by other people. Not CNet customer reviews, genuine substantial coverage in the tech press or newspapers. Otherwise we can't verify that it meets our core policies.

Please believe that you are not the first person to get off to a bad start like this. Take some time to read around the project, especially the

Five Pillars of Wikipedia, and you will come to understand why we remove articles which lack strong sourcing. Guy (Help!) 09:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Why are only select companies or setups allowed to have articles about them and not others? What harm is there in writing stubs about related companies?uyi 09:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Because if those stubs do not have proper attribution, then they are open to having all kinds of possibly fake information inserted in them.

e g92contribs 11:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]