User talk:Radiatoraligator

Hi Radiatoraligator! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per Wikipedia:External links, links to otherwebsites are not placed into the body of an article, as per your recent edits. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Faye. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Michael Faye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The page Michael Faye redirects to Michael Fay

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Waggie were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many primary sources here, and along with the unsourced content, I don't see this as ready for mainspace yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Faye (economist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Faye (economist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 03:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Radiatoraligator! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the talk) 03:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Radiatoraligator. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems that the Spectrum piece is the only one that fully meets the

WP:GNG

standard, and it alone isn't enough to establish notability. It's not clear quite what the first source is, and whether it is both independent and secondary. It might also count towards GNG, but even then it's not enough to get this over the line. We need to see what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about the organisation (with significant coverage, not just passing mentions).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:New York Focus
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New York Focus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]