User talk:Radiohist

Your opinion re

You are just belittling what said. Since when is Tim Lawson and Alisa Persons' book not a reliable source. It is obvious that Kath Soucie was in school during 1967. Having started her voice over career in the 1980s at 19, when she graduated from The American Academy of Dramatic Arts in the 1970s, not possible is it? Radiohist (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Woodson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Rivalry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listen: in re Lee Grant (and Kath Soucie) goes, I have decided not to engage in an edit war with you, given your obsession with Grant. I know what it's like to be obsessed about stuff. But your edit summary coment, to wit (italics and emphases added): "please see talk page and do not add birthdate unless you have a reliable source which shows subject doesn't mind [,] it is not about the insults", shows you are going too far. Am going too far?!?You are clearly making fun of the womanRadiohist (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopaedias (and Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fansite) do not self-censor based upon what a public figure subject likes or does not like. As a matter of fact unless and until Grant contacts the Wikimedia Foundation to complain the article and if they then decide the info should be removed, this article could stay with the correct birthdate. You do not have the right to dictate other editors' editing practices based on what you think an 87 year old woman (Grant) would or would not like. That is absurd. Do you get it? I don't want to have to take this to

What exactly are we supposed to talk about? This editor is clearly engaged in a war and won't stop until his goal of getting the birthdate is accomplished, But the birthdate is not given a reliable source, it has not been supported by the New York, Los Angeles or Denver Times, but by the United States Census, which is not considered a reliable source as has been stated many times. Your hostility towards me and Ms. Grant (but mainly towards me) is not encyclopedic and your constant repetition of the age is immature. The 1925 date has been widespread thanks to Wikipedia, no one else. By the way why did you wish a happy birthday on her talk page when the talk page is not used for that purpose. Radiohist (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"This editor is clearly engaged in a war and won't stop until his goal of getting the birthdate is accomplished": this is untrue; I have not re-added the birth info (which you removed), much less the 1925 year (although I know it is accurate), just as I explained on your talk page. What I disagree with is your insistence that living subjects of articles in an encyclopaedia must agree to what is written about them regardless of what would otherwise be considered valid sourcing, or at least that is how I am interpreting your editing as indicating on your part. Yours, Quis separabit? 20:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"By the way why did you wish a happy birthday on her talk page when the talk page is not used for that purpose." -- well due to your efforts I presumed she was keeping an eye on her Wikipedia article so I took the opportunity to wish her a happy birthday when that day rolled around (October 31) and reminded her to be happy she is still around, unlike my father (also born in 1925, who died in 2009). Faux pas?? Quis separabit? 20:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I DID NOT WRITE

Wikipedia:Primary sources, which is not what your Census records considered to be. ^{[clarification needed}

]

"well due to your efforts I presumed she was keeping an eye on her Wikipedia article" That's interesting McGee, but that ain't the way i heard it. That was in 2012, didn't start working on this then, started working on it this year. You were rubbing it in her face, weren't you? Very mature, McGee, very very mature.Radiohist (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, October 31, 2012. I don't remember why. Maybe others were changing the year back and forth even back then. I meant no disrespect to Ms. Grant, who I know is a fine actress. If she is upset, please convey my apologies. Quis separabit? 21:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: If I am "McGee", are you Tony? Who are Jethro, Duckie, Ziva and Abby?? Quis separabit? 21:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boy, do I feel old. Didn't mean McGee as in Timothy McGee, meant McGee as in Fibber McGee. Radiohist (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I am Fibber McGee then I guess you're Molly. Anyway I just remembered why I became active in late 2012 on the Grant article; an IP editor (108.89.38.123), who may or may not have been you, was deleting the year of birth, which I attributed as unexplained IP edits to vandalism. Quis separabit? 22:01, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, that wasn't me and no I can't be Molly, but I can be The Old-Timer. Radiohist (talk) 11:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I can't be Molly": I only added that ("I guess you're Molly") because I wasn't certain about your gender and I couldn't think of an acceptable way to inquire without sounding nosy, although I see now (in hindsight) that I suspected correctly. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Bennett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Tick (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Andrea Romano may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gordon Hunt (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Richie Rich Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charlie Adler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[The Yogi Bear Show]]]'' - Director Sammy Baby and Buffallo Billy

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Adler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Replacements (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Evanier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fred Newman (actor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]''. He has also done character voices and sounds effects as a voice actor in numerous film]], television, and video game credits including ''[[Who Framed Roger Rabbit]]'', ''[[Doug]]'' (as [[
• episodes, 1989-1993) of The All New Mickey Mouse Club (1989-1994) (with Mowava Pryor or Teri Misner]] as the other co-host) that launched the careers of Britney Spears, Keri Russell, Justin Timberlake,

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mel Blanc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neptune's Daughter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Carey (United States Capitol Shooting Incident) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mindy Sterling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legit (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radiohist. I suggest that you report this matter regarding

Hi! But of course, that the exhibits information on the Boomerang channel. The only thing that worries me is the change of Boomerang channel on Cartoonito. I'd wanted to Boomerang and Cartoonito were aired as two separate channels. At Boomerang broadcast aired of classic cartoon series as Yogi Bear or Top Cat and Cartoonito television series for little childrens as The Ha Ha Hairies, Bananas in Pyjamas and Jelly Jamm. I don't know whether in this state Boomerang still pull due to the lengthening Cartoonito block, which currently is broadcast 13 hours. I wonder what will happen in the future, when Boomerang ended their broadcast? Without Boomerang channel it will not be the same. Matti1990 (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For now, there comes to my mind no idea. While Boomerang will share airtime with Cartoonito block, everything can change. And to write a petition for separation from Boomerang to Cartoonito will be really hard. Matti1990 (talk) 12:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jimmy Lydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mister Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Dmol (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Casey Kasem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police Story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cow and Chicken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Stanton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Don Messick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to G.I. Joe (TV series)

Irene Tedrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to My Friend Irma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Brown (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strangers on a Train (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Alexander Litvinenko is not mentioned in Putin's page is SICK.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Gabel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sky's the Limit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan Gilvezan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change Dina Merrill's year of birth back to 1925. 1923 is accurate per reflinks, Intelius, census records, etc.Your editing history shows that you are a borderline vandal. Such behavior will not be tolerated, and you will be blocked from editing if you continue in this vein. Apologies for overreacting; misread some of the notices on your talk page and misjudged situation. Sorry. Quis separabit? 18:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links re Merrill's year of birth

• this one gives her age in July 1935 as 11 but miscalculated date/year of birth as 12/29/1924, since her birthdate and age of 11, indicate 1923
• this one shows 12/29/1923 -- correct date/year of birth
• Intelius showing she is 90 as of today and will be through December 28, 23:59 (she has more than one Intelius thread as do many people, especially if they have used more than one name, and she has been Nedenia Hutton Robertson Hartley (plus a few more in there))

Yours, Quis separabit? 18:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Yours, Quis separabit? 17:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I like familysearch.org, but it is not always accurate. I was just showing you that the site contains more than one entry for some (many?) individuals, sometimes with varying info. Yours, Quis separabit? 17:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have to realize that a human being typed that, and all humans are fallible. I see it says 1926 but the date was 5 July 1933, and little Lyova was 7 years old, as she had not yet reached her birthday -- 31 October, when she turned 8 that year. I suspect someone just made a mistake when calculating; also 5 & 6 can look very similar. Yours, Quis separabit? 18:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The US census is not inherently unreliable, any more than a ship's manifest is always reliable. I don't support removing 1925 but I do support, if you wish, adding that some sources have cited 1926 (and 1927 for that matter), and explain in footnotes. Quis separabit? 18:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, dude. I updated the text on Grant to try to reach a fair compromise. As far as Janet Waldo, I haven't been editing that page (at least recently, don't remember if or when the last time I did edit that page) but I did take a look and tweaked the Waldo page as per your comments, accordingly. Yours, Quis separabit? 23:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gibbsville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Adler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pound Puppies (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transformers: Rescue Bots may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Rob Paulsen's Talkin Toons podcast |publisher=Techjives.net |date=2012-09-07 |accessdate=2013-04-01}}</ref></ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-news/rescue-bots-43/michael-bell-
• Rescue Bots Season 3|last=Fury|first=Sol|work=TFW2005.com|date=July 1, 2014|accessdate=July 4, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick D. Wasserman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy End. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patricia Parris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McFarland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Stephenson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leslie Howard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [9], that was sloppy on my part. My apologies. I shouldn't have blanketed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright.Radiohist (talk) 15:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for linking from your Jack MacBryde article to my Death Valley Days (radio program) article.Eddie Blick (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per your comment in [10] I have removed the birthdays and birth years for the actors mentioned where they are not properly sourced.

I found the edit by the person who added the birth year for Karen. HERE. If they are still active, you can send them the note. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment and your encouragement. I must admit that I didn't know much about Mr. Studebaker, but when I saw his article I decided to try to find more information. I hope to add more information to his article in the coming days. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verna Felton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Egypt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mel Blanc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dennis the Menace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Piers Morgan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. The guy brings out the worst in me. Still, he has no right to insult John Cleese. So... I kind of don't apologize.Radiohist (talk) 12:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand, not my favourite person either, I can not believe he calls himself a gooner, but that does not mean the edit was okay. Please dont let your "anger" out on wikipedia in the future. Qed237 (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Candi Milo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilfred (TV show). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hey. I'm wondering if you can help me with something, given your expertise in this subject area. A woman named Rachel (Rae) Hargrave supposedly hosted a political radio talk show in District of Columbia during the 1950s. Some of her guests were John Steinbeck and Melvin Purvis. Rachel was also a journalist, like for example working at the SMPTE. Do you know a way to figure out the name of the show, is there some kind of archive in which one can retrieve facts about old-time radio shows? Thanks in advance. OscarL 20:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey and Happy New Year. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find any more information than you have on Ms. Hargrave. There are plenty of sites with archives on otr, but they concern radio entertainment programs. The archives on Google newspapers didn't come up with anything either. I will keep searching and asking about her. Thank you for the kinds words, however, political radio talk shows aren't really an interest of mine and it is my opinion that they (and television) have contributed to the extinction of radio series. You can get a much better understanding of the world by listening to Adventures in Odyssey than by listening to Rush Limbaugh. My regards.Radiohist (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for my late reply. Thank you very much for your help. I managed to figure out the name of the show, it was called "Inside Government". I'm personally also bored by political programs, but I wanted to see whether Rachel Hargrave was notable enough to warrant an article here at Wikipedia. OscarL 10:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of living actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Giant (film) and John Saxon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Angel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarence (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this New Yorker magazine article [11] which confirms her birth year of 1972. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If they had asked her about her birth year, she would have gladly told them 1965. Someone over here wrote 1972 and added 29 days to her birth date and there you are. Same thing with Candi Milo, but she went on Rob's podcast and clarified she is five years older than the year we wrote. Because of Wiki, unfortunately, the 1972 year has been distributed all through the internet. This is the only place you can find her real age - http://www.intelius.com/results.php?ReportType=1&qf=Jennifer&qmi=&qn=Hale&qcs=Mammoth+Lakes%2C+CA&focusfirst=0. I'd give you her email (not over here due to obvious reasons) if she would allow it.Radiohist (talk) 18:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying she lied about her age on the New Yorker? You cannot use Intellius to source her birth year. That violates BLP. If you are concerned that the article is inaccurate, despite detailing all her other facts in the interview, then state so and the only thing that can be done is to remove the birth year. You cannot place 1965 without a reliable source. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 1 is confirmed by Hale's Twitter account. January 30 was not sourced by anything usable. Possibly mentioned in Nintendo Power but that is an offline magazine so one would have to check that page on that magazine to confirm it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am saying that she was never asked about her age in her interview with Mr. Bissell.Radiohist (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excerpt from article, "Hale was born in Labrador in 1972, and holds dual Canadian-American citizenship. She grew up mostly in the American South. She told me that her mother, who died four years ago, was “a wandering master’s-degree pursuer” who eventually settled on a career in epidemiology. Hale’s biological father is an outdoorsman and an intellectual (“He’d be really pissed if he heard me call him an intellectual”) who still lives in Labrador. The man who Hale says “has been my dad most of my life,” and who was married to her mother for five years, is a semi-retired microbiologist and researcher for the Gates Foundation. Based on this, one might imagine Hale’s childhood as a succession of bookish family dinners, cheerily contested Trivial Pursuit games, and bedtime stories starring friendly prokaryotes. In reality, Hale told me, “I had, probably, a more challenging experience growing up than most middle-class chicks.” This is a Wikipedia-notable journalist who interviewed her in detail, not some random person who would grab random facts from the Internet and post an article about it. He can easily verify her age by asking her. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bissell is an excellent journalist. But, that doesn't change the fact that he did not ask her about her age. The woman graduated the Alabama School of Finer Arts in 1982 when she was 17, not 7!!!! She can verify her age even easier. Again, I would give you mail to ask her, but I can't do without Jennifer's permission and I certainly won't do it here.Radiohist (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide the graduation source about 1982 then? Is that a reliable source? Then the birth year can be contested and removed. I'm okay with removing the birth year if that part is reliably sourced. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the graduation and for the 1965 year are all one and the same - Jennifer Hale.Radiohist (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right. That one Intelius is no good to use per

WP:BLPPRIMARY "Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses." AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't see her graduation year in Intelius, so that must be some subscription detail through public records. Asking Hale directly and privately (email, phone, text, or in person at a convention) is original research and cannot be used either. If she wants to contact Wikipedia and ask to remove his birth year, that's fine, then there will be an OTRS record officially requesting her birth year be removed. A cleaner way would be for her to publicly tweet that she wasn't born in 1972 and would prefer not to disclose her real birth year, and we can use that tweet to remove the year. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She doesn't mind her year of birth being included in her bio! What made you come to such an illogical conclusion? You're not realizing the problem. It's that she doesn't see why she is made younger than she is. And you obviously don't believe that I've got all this information from the horse's mouth. The truth will never be known if you insist on a source, because every single one websites, newspapers have scribbled down the 1972 year, which was uploaded by someone, who had made an educated guess as to when she was born in 2006. Have you read Catch-22? May I remind you that there were even some inconsistencies in Jimmy Wales's Wiki page? Hale was not born in 1972. That's a fact. Your sources can't change that. I am sorry, but I am going to have to follow Wikipedia:Ignore all rules on this one.Radiohist (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is that illogical? She interviews with the guy, and the article is printed. It presents her as being born in 1972. So it is logical to assume either: 1) She gave the correct year of birth. 2) The article posts her with a later year of birth and she doesn't care at least to the point of posting a correction on a website or a tweet. It is not a big deal to take down the year as long as you can back it up. Look, I just now found an article that confirms the 1982 graduation date. [12] That's enough to contradict the birth year. You could present that, and now the year can be taken down. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are terrific!:) How did you find this? That's so incredible. Radiohist (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible she might have graduated from middle school 8th grade or 5th grade, as the school is a K-12, but it's enough to contest her real graduation. Why would a school newsletter list 1982 if it were not for high school? She also said she majored in Art there. [13] so I would think that would be something closer to teenage years rather than 5th grade for the 10 years old. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC), updated 23:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's also all this detail about how the K-12 school has majors. [14] I don't know what it was like in 1982 though, but it's enough to convince me that majoring in 5th grade was probably not a sensible conclusion. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you very much.Radiohist (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, confirmed she went there for high school: [15] It's got some nice early pics. Added it to external links. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow-up to this, I have now taken down the birth month and day and moved it to the talk page. If there's a newer news article that correctly pinpoints her birth year then we can revisit this, but for now, her birth year is assumed to be private information as she isn't tweeting about it. No need to bother her with personal correspondence for now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well said, User:AngusWOOF. Radiohist (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spouse

I need to find some news articles confirming when she got married and that she married Barry Oswick. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They got married around 2009. She mentions her son is 1 and a half on Rob's podcast - http://techjives.net/2012/04/20/037-jennifer-hale-on-talkin-toons-with-rob-paulsen-weekly-voice-acting-and-voice-over-tips/. Perhaps born somewhere towards the end of 2010. I am still searching for news articles, but it's doubtful we'll get something more substantial that Bissell's interview.Radiohist (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mimi Gibson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Buccaneer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you changed the birthname of Ed Gilbert from Giesbert to Gilbert. Do you actually know whether it was his birth name? I mean, do you have any external source for that? I can't find any particularly good source the other way too, but searching for the two names, it looks ... interesting. --denny vrandečić (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of living actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keeper of the Bees. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of living actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood

added a link pointing to The Birds

Robert Ellis (actor, born 1933)

added a link pointing to April Showers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruce Cabot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moray Watson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Run for Your Wife. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radiohist. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Please respect consensus at all articles, but be especially cautious where ArbCom remedies are in effect. Thanks!

―Mandruss ☎ 23:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid vandalizing high-profile pages (or any pages at all, for that matter). I see you are a long-term user, so it'd be a shame for you to be blocked for one of the most-obvious, earliest-learned-about offenses.

In the case of the subject, I think any sort of critisim is well-deserved. I won't take my anger on Wikipedia. However, you can understand why I wrote that down.Radiohist (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have my own views about Trump and understand that you have your own feelings about him; however, as you just said you would, it's best to keep those feelings to yourself or at least out of Wikipedia articles. Any such personal views should extend no further than your userpage. Anyway, I don't want to come off as though I'm lecturing you; the act is done, and you've already said you won't do it again. All the best,

(talk) 22:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

All the best to you, too and I truly hope you soon see Trump for what he truly is. A dangerous, self-absorbed blowhard. The White House website has removed the LGBTQ+ page, the Climate Change page, as well as the Disabilities page. Enough said.Radiohist (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to Lee Grant an RFC has been started at Talk:Lee Grant#RfC about Lee Grant's date of birth to resolve the dispute over how to present Grant's age. I am leaving you notification so that you have an opportunity to comment. Betty Logan (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Betty Logan Thank you very much for the notification.Radiohist (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of living actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Tyler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the edit about her real name being Carren Learning. On the talk page there's a link to a book that discusses Jim Learning's arrest and his daughter Carren Dujela. Also on @jhaletweets, she cross-references @CarrenLD, who is a different person, but still the source for her early alias. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that her real name is Carren Dujela?Radiohist (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, she must have a sister named Carren Dujela. Here are articles showing her as Jim Learning's daughter: [16] [17] [18] [19] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, her birth name may be Jennifer, but her birth last name might be Learning. I searched her on intelius many years ago and both last names showed up in her name. Along with the 1965 birth year. By the way, you should have added that she graduated high school in 1982. Radiohist (talk) 21:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was covered in our previous discussion. The high school one is a footnote now as you can see. The VOCM one is a good secondary source coverage to replace her tweet, and it includes her tweet anyways. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added father's details in the personal life section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great! But do we have any idea as to what her birthname might be? As I told you Intelius had both Learning and Dujela. It's ridiculous that the Bissel article states that she was born in 1972 and that she was in the class of '82. Someone's editors aren't doing their job.Radiohist (talk) 02:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, can't fault Bissell; he still does a great job covering her life. I use that article as an example of a well-covered news article about a voice actor. Hale is probably happy to be considered to be younger than she is. I can't even find a decent source for her spouse's name or marriage date. He's appeared in some of her videos though, like ice bucket challenge. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She finds it kinda annoying, because she knows actresses being vain about ageing is a cliche. They were married in 2009, but you knew that.Radiohist (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your question to me here, I left an edit summary that included a link to the relevant policy when I made the revert (i.e. "rv sock edits per

]

September 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on James Woods. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been reverting back to the same page. If you check, you'll see that I have adjusted my sources so as to comply with the criticism of User:Slightlymad. I see no reason why that user doesn't have an edit warning. First, he/she removed my edits on the basis that it didn't have a source (it did as you can see. Afterwards, I added a better source, though I neglected to delete the unreliable one and he/she deleted my edits stating that it isn't a reliable source. Only referring to one of them, when I had put two sources. This is by no means not a two way street.Radiohist (talk) 23:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read

^mad 05:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Radiohist. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you're editing an article that has a stub template on it, please note that Wikipedia format is that the stub template goes after the category declarations, not before them. I've noticed several articles where you've moved a correctly placed stub template above the categories, so please don't do that — it belongs after them, not before. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 02:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

(it has been more than a year since your last alert) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're revert here appears to be in violation of the "You must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article." editing restriction. You should self-revert that edit Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Brett Kavanaugh article has the

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Betty Boop Movie Mystery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radiohist. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding an external link in the edit summary does not equal adding content to the article. If you want the article to have an LGBT category, then you need to add material to the article that mentions the lesbian character in the film, with one or more

You are unwilling to comply with the need to support your edits as explained in above message re same. You've chosen to tune out this message that I left in your talk page and related discussion about

welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox

for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Pyxis Solitary yak 08:45, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Catherine Thompson did voice Marcia on the Jetsons You know Catherine Thompson, the same voice behind the various golden book and tape stories such as the Garfield ones? No she can't confirm them right now because unless you know how to communicate with the dead, be my guest.

I'd love to in-line cite but 1, some fool semi-protected the article, and Wikipedia still uses the 2007 styel visual captcha system which does not work with my screen-reader.

I have the DVD of season 3, and Thompson has done voices on the Jetsons.

Again, for other work she' sbeen on look up on th einternet, including her voice on various golden book and tapes such as the Garfield and the Poke Little Puppy audiobooks.

R.I.P. Catherine (1933-2017). 38.111.120.74 (talk) 13:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That does not appear to be true as she isn't listed in the end credits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsQAFU2Mrn0 Radiohist (talk) 03:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patricia Clarkson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Cards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TFD (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Candi Milo. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spoof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit of

List of comedy television series with LGBT characters

Re your 07:11, 30 March 2020 edit. The list is arranged by year of premiere, even if for one season only. The list is not organized by exact premiere date and/or end date. Do not reinvent how the list is edited without seeking

That is not true. Kindly check the list please.Radiohist (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel Good is placed before High Fidelity. The former had a March premiere, while High Fidelity started airing in Fberuary.Radiohist (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Series are added according to year of premiere -- not by the month of premiere within the year. A series is added whenever an editor adds one. That's how this and other related lists have been edited since they were created. You want to reinvent the wheel? Seek consensus from other editors. You want editors to organize the series chronologically by the month of the year? Seek consensus. You want lists to be re-arranged afterwards according to what series are still airing (as you did in your 07:11, 30 March 2020 edit)? Seek consensus. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 08:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true. This one - List of animated series with LGBT characters is listed exactly like that. By month and day the series premiered.Radiohist (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have already initiated a discussion so we can make the chronology of the list more like

List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2010-2014 where it is listed by premiere date.Radiohist (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Radiohist,

Do you have any references that we could

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Magarditch Halvadjian. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Elizium23 (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Magarditch Halvadjian. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Say no to transphobia.Radiohist (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding Zhirinovsky's homosexuality to my user talk. I don't want to discuss it. If my edit bothers you so much, then go ahead and add it back, and I won't do it again. Now please leave me alone.Petrandreev13 (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• As a further reminder, leaving the same message repeatedly on a user's talk page is a violation of the
  three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Radiohist, could you explain why you made this edit? Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC) talk[reply]

Hello, i did see a source that stated Jeffries was elected speaker, but upon further check it was unreliable, which is why I reverted it as you can check.Radiohist (talk) 21:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following on Twitter, huh? —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did remove my edit, which proves it wasn't vandalism in any way, shape or form. If it had been I would have left it there, but I removed it. And whoever considers it vandalism, frankly is wrong.Radiohist (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, not a big deal this time. But keep that in mind going further, and always keep a source handy whenever adding anything. If you can't find one RS, maybe you're missing something. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can guarantee that one little snafu shouldn't discredit my long years of useful editing that has brought upon new information and has enriched Wikipedia.Radiohist (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, small mistakes happen. I understand that you might have been in an hurry to update the latest information hoping to add a source later, which is something many of us probably did in our wikilives. So, that's alright. I don't want to discredit your contributions at all. I'm sorry if you feel so. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 22:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. DanCherek (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Now kindly ask the other user for an explanation for his edit. Thank you in advance.Radiohist (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC) [he/him][reply]

CX Zoom That is alright. No hard feelings. If there is tiny suspicion of misinformation, the person should be asked questions so they can explain themselves.Radiohist (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[he/him][reply]

Hello! I'm CX Zoom. Your recent edit(s) to the page 2023 Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]