User talk:Rafavargas

Hello, Rafavargas, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field . Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Me-123567-Me Happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

I understand you are trying to say that courts throughout the country have extended marriage to same-sex couples on an ad hoc, couple-by-couple basis. But those ad hoc events just don't count for the template's purposes. It is by longstanding convention that the template is limited to listing places that by court decree or statute have made SSM generally available. That has happened in Bahia, but not in the other places. -Rrius (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Template:Same-sex unions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He Ravargas; a short question regarding the same sex marriage state you introduced. If I google translate the source, it focusses very strongly on conversion of same sex unions to marriages. Are you sure it is also is for the "normal" marriage procedure? Maybe we have the official decision to back it up? L.tak (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]